1986•Unpublished venueRequires access

Inservice Training for Special Education Placement Teams.

Stan F. Shaw

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This inservice training program for special education placement team members has been implemented in a variety of school districts ranging from a rural town to inner-city school systems of more than 20 schools. Key characteristics of the program reflect the following data-based quality'practices cited in D. Cline's (1984) analysis of inservice training programs: (1) the program is based on actual observation and critique of placement team meetings for every relevant constituency in the school system; (2) the program is based on assessed needs; (3) administrative support is apparent; (4) collaboration in decision making and planning is a key element; (5) the school site is the locus of training where actual placement teams receive training on improving their performance on real cases; (6) trainers demonstrate the ability to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and (7) intrinsic incentives for participation are provided in the form ef feedback on performance, recommendations for improvement, expert answers to questions, and clarification on requirements of the regulations. The program's success in fostering productive change has been confirmed by independent or in-house evaluations and by follow-up team observations. Other evaluation approaches have included questionnaires, random interviews, and use of a Likert scale to assess attitudes and skills. (JW)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT This inservice training program for special education placement team members has been implemented in a variety of school districts ranging from a rural town to inner-city school systems of more than 20 schools. Key characteristics of the program reflect the following data-based quality'practices cited in D. Cline's (1984) analysis of inservice training programs: (1) the program is based on actual observation and critique of placement team meetings for every relevant constituency in the school system; (2) the program is based on assessed needs; (3) administrative support is apparent; (4) collaboration in decision making and planning is a key element; (5) the school site is the locus of training where actual placement teams receive training on improving their performance on real cases; (6) trainers demonstrate the ability to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and (7) intrinsic incentives for participation are provided in the form ef feedback on performance, recommendations for improvement, expert answers to questions, and clarification on requirements of the regulations. The program's success in fostering productive change has been confirmed by independent or in-house evaluations and by follow-up team observations. Other evaluation approaches have included questionnaires, random interviews, and use of a Likert scale to assess attitudes and skills. (JW)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT This inservice training program for special education placement team members has been implemented in a variety of school districts ranging from a rural town to inner-city school systems of more than 20 schools. Key characteristics of the program reflect the following data-based quality'practices cited in D. Cline's (1984) analysis of inservice training programs: (1) the program is based on actual observation and critique of placement team meetings for every relevant constituency in the school system; (2) the program is based on assessed needs; (3) administrative support is apparent; (4) collaboration in decision making and planning is a key element; (5) the school site is the locus of training where actual placement teams receive training on improving their performance on real cases; (6) trainers demonstrate the ability to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and (7) intrinsic incentives for participation are provided in the form ef feedback on performance, recommendations for improvement, expert answers to questions, and clarification on requirements of the regulations. The program's success in fostering productive change has been confirmed by independent or in-house evaluations and by follow-up team observations. Other evaluation approaches have included questionnaires, random interviews, and use of a Likert scale to assess attitudes and skills. (JW)

Key concepts: Likert scale, Training (meteorology), Incentive, Bridge (graph theory), Variety (cybernetics), Medical education, Psychology, Program evaluation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inservice Training for Special Education Placement Teams. — Research Paper | ScholarLens