2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Decision-making Patterns in Police Use-of-Force Cases Before the Federal Courts of Appeal: 1991-1996

Joseph A. Sch fer, Thomas J. Martinelli, D. Kail Loper

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This study examines characteristics and trends in police use-of-force cases reviewed by the United States Courts of Appeals. Specifically, the authors examine how the courts handle suits brought against the police for alleged excessive force. Preliminary attention is given to the content of such cases, including the nature of the force at issue, the parties named in such suits, and additional legal claims made by the plaintiffs. Further attention is given to those cases in which the Courts of Appeals reverse the original decision made by the federal district court. The findings identify reasons why the district and appellate courts disagreed on certain cases and indicated that, at least at the appellate level, the police and citizens prevail in a similar proportion of the cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines characteristics and trends in police use-of-force cases reviewed by the United States Courts of Appeals. Specifically, the authors examine how the courts handle suits brought against the police for alleged excessive force. Preliminary attention is given to the content of such cases, including the nature of the force at issue, the parties named in such suits, and additional legal claims made by the plaintiffs. Further attention is given to those cases in which the Courts of Appeals reverse the original decision made by the federal district court. The findings identify reasons why the district and appellate courts disagreed on certain cases and indicated that, at least at the appellate level, the police and citizens prevail in a similar proportion of the cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines characteristics and trends in police use-of-force cases reviewed by the United States Courts of Appeals. Specifically, the authors examine how the courts handle suits brought against the police for alleged excessive force. Preliminary attention is given to the content of such cases, including the nature of the force at issue, the parties named in such suits, and additional legal claims made by the plaintiffs. Further attention is given to those cases in which the Courts of Appeals reverse the original decision made by the federal district court. The findings identify reasons why the district and appellate courts disagreed on certain cases and indicated that, at least at the appellate level, the police and citizens prevail in a similar proportion of the cases.

Key concepts: Appeal, Plaintiff, Law, Political science, Use of force, International law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decision-making Patterns in Police Use-of-Force Cases Before the Federal Courts of Appeal: 1991-1996 — Research Paper | ScholarLens