2007Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

‘Unhappy Consciousness’: Reflexivity and Contradiction in Jean-Paul Sartre’s Changing Conception of the Role of the Intellectual

Leon Culbertson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Jean-Paul Sartre articulated two distinctly different conceptions of the role of the intellectual. He cited the events of May–June 1968 as central to the precipitation of circumstances that necessitated a move from the classic to the revolutionary intellectual (sometimes also referred to by Sartre as the ‘leftist’ or ‘new’ intellectual). This chapter will argue that it would be a mistake to regard a specific set of political events as solely responsible for bringing about this alteration in Sartre’s position. The chapter will attempt to place Sartre’s changing conception of the role of the intellectual within the wider context of his own pre-reflective ‘fundamental project’ as an intellectual. The chapter will explore the dialectical relationship between Sartre’s abandonment of literature as a bourgeois art form in favour of existential biography, his political writing and action and his changing conception of the role of the intellectual. This will be done in a manner that is broadly consistent with the dialectical nominalism he developed in the Critique of Dialectical Reason . The themes of contradiction and reflexivity will be highlighted to illustrate the dialectical understanding Sartre’s own work can give of his conception of the role of the intellectual. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Jean-Paul Sartre articulated two distinctly different conceptions of the role of the intellectual. He cited the events of May–June 1968 as central to the precipitation of circumstances that necessitated a move from the classic to the revolutionary intellectual (sometimes also referred to by Sartre as the ‘leftist’ or ‘new’ intellectual). This chapter will argue that it would be a mistake to regard a specific set of political events as solely responsible for bringing about this alteration in Sartre’s position. The chapter will attempt to place Sartre’s changing conception of the role of the intellectual within the wider context of his own pre-reflective ‘fundamental project’ as an intellectual. The chapter will explore the dialectical relationship between Sartre’s abandonment of literature as a bourgeois art form in favour of existential biography, his political writing and action and his changing conception of the role of the intellectual. This will be done in a manner that is broadly consistent with the dialectical nominalism he developed in the Critique of Dialectical Reason . The themes of contradiction and reflexivity will be highlighted to illustrate the dialectical understanding Sartre’s own work can give of his conception of the role of the intellectual. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Jean-Paul Sartre articulated two distinctly different conceptions of the role of the intellectual. He cited the events of May–June 1968 as central to the precipitation of circumstances that necessitated a move from the classic to the revolutionary intellectual (sometimes also referred to by Sartre as the ‘leftist’ or ‘new’ intellectual). This chapter will argue that it would be a mistake to regard a specific set of political events as solely responsible for bringing about this alteration in Sartre’s position. The chapter will attempt to place Sartre’s changing conception of the role of the intellectual within the wider context of his own pre-reflective ‘fundamental project’ as an intellectual. The chapter will explore the dialectical relationship between Sartre’s abandonment of literature as a bourgeois art form in favour of existential biography, his political writing and action and his changing conception of the role of the intellectual. This will be done in a manner that is broadly consistent with the dialectical nominalism he developed in the Critique of Dialectical Reason . The themes of contradiction and reflexivity will be highlighted to illustrate the dialectical understanding Sartre’s own work can give of his conception of the role of the intellectual. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Dialectic, Contradiction, Epistemology, Existentialism, Reflexivity, Politics, Philosophy, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘Unhappy Consciousness’: Reflexivity and Contradiction in Jean-Paul Sartre’s Changing Conception of the Role of the Intellectual — Research Paper | ScholarLens