1982OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Interim storage of spent extended-burnup LWR fuel

Andrew B. Johnson, Wendell J. Bailey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The existing data base for interim storage of spent water reactor fuel has been reviewed and is summarized. Relevance of current experience with storage of spent fuel to storage of extended-burnup fuel is described. There is no evidence to date that extended burnup will lead to degradation of spent, light-water reactor fuel during wet storage. The availability of well-characterized extended-burnup fuel assemblies offers a cost-effective opportunity to obtain additional evidence of spent fuel behavior in wet storage. Extending fuel burnup has a favorable impact on the spent fuel inventory: it reduces the rate at which spent fuel accumulates, which lowers the storage requirements. A disadvantage of extended-burnup fuel designs is their increased initial enrichment, which may necessitate changes in storage facilities or methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The existing data base for interim storage of spent water reactor fuel has been reviewed and is summarized. Relevance of current experience with storage of spent fuel to storage of extended-burnup fuel is described. There is no evidence to date that extended burnup will lead to degradation of spent, light-water reactor fuel during wet storage. The availability of well-characterized extended-burnup fuel assemblies offers a cost-effective opportunity to obtain additional evidence of spent fuel behavior in wet storage. Extending fuel burnup has a favorable impact on the spent fuel inventory: it reduces the rate at which spent fuel accumulates, which lowers the storage requirements. A disadvantage of extended-burnup fuel designs is their increased initial enrichment, which may necessitate changes in storage facilities or methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The existing data base for interim storage of spent water reactor fuel has been reviewed and is summarized. Relevance of current experience with storage of spent fuel to storage of extended-burnup fuel is described. There is no evidence to date that extended burnup will lead to degradation of spent, light-water reactor fuel during wet storage. The availability of well-characterized extended-burnup fuel assemblies offers a cost-effective opportunity to obtain additional evidence of spent fuel behavior in wet storage. Extending fuel burnup has a favorable impact on the spent fuel inventory: it reduces the rate at which spent fuel accumulates, which lowers the storage requirements. A disadvantage of extended-burnup fuel designs is their increased initial enrichment, which may necessitate changes in storage facilities or methods.

Key concepts: Burnup, Spent nuclear fuel, Environmental science, Spent fuel pool, Waste management, Interim, Nuclear engineering, MOX fuel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interim storage of spent extended-burnup LWR fuel — Research Paper | ScholarLens