1993•ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)Requires access

EPRI's Evaluation of the Elwha Dam Eicher Screen and Subsequent Design Changes and Hydraulic Tests.

F C Winchell, Ned Taft, Tom Cook, Cody Sullivan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has conducted two years of biological evaluations of an Eicher Screen installed in a 9-foot (2.7 m) diameter penstock at the Elwha Hydroelectric Project in Washington state. Testing has shown passage survival to equal or exceed 98.7% for steelhead trout Oncorhynchus mykiss smolts and coho salmon O. kisutch and chinook salmon O. tshawytscha smolts and fingerlings. Scale loss injuries were minimal at velocities of 4-6 fps, but increased at higher velocities. Most injuries occurred from fish contacting the screen in an area where it transitions from 63% porosity to 32% porosity wedgewire material, where the velocity component perpendicular to the screen was relatively high. Hydraulic model studies conducted in 1992 indicated that a more gradual reduction of the porosity in the downstream end of the screen would reduce the observed velocity peak by approximately 10%, but would not achieve a fully uniform flow distribution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has conducted two years of biological evaluations of an Eicher Screen installed in a 9-foot (2.7 m) diameter penstock at the Elwha Hydroelectric Project in Washington state. Testing has shown passage survival to equal or exceed 98.7% for steelhead trout Oncorhynchus mykiss smolts and coho salmon O. kisutch and chinook salmon O. tshawytscha smolts and fingerlings. Scale loss injuries were minimal at velocities of 4-6 fps, but increased at higher velocities. Most injuries occurred from fish contacting the screen in an area where it transitions from 63% porosity to 32% porosity wedgewire material, where the velocity component perpendicular to the screen was relatively high. Hydraulic model studies conducted in 1992 indicated that a more gradual reduction of the porosity in the downstream end of the screen would reduce the observed velocity peak by approximately 10%, but would not achieve a fully uniform flow distribution.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has conducted two years of biological evaluations of an Eicher Screen installed in a 9-foot (2.7 m) diameter penstock at the Elwha Hydroelectric Project in Washington state. Testing has shown passage survival to equal or exceed 98.7% for steelhead trout Oncorhynchus mykiss smolts and coho salmon O. kisutch and chinook salmon O. tshawytscha smolts and fingerlings. Scale loss injuries were minimal at velocities of 4-6 fps, but increased at higher velocities. Most injuries occurred from fish contacting the screen in an area where it transitions from 63% porosity to 32% porosity wedgewire material, where the velocity component perpendicular to the screen was relatively high. Hydraulic model studies conducted in 1992 indicated that a more gradual reduction of the porosity in the downstream end of the screen would reduce the observed velocity peak by approximately 10%, but would not achieve a fully uniform flow distribution.

Key concepts: Dam removal, Engineering, Environmental science, Geotechnical engineering, Forensic engineering, Hydrology (agriculture), Geology, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EPRI's Evaluation of the Elwha Dam Eicher Screen and Subsequent Design Changes and Hydraulic Tests. — Research Paper | ScholarLens