1998•Distributed Generation & Alternative Energy JournalRequires access

DuPont Cuts Energy Consumption 8%- For Starters

Kim Wiseman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

DuPont's Corporate Energy Leadership Team (CELT) faced adifficult challenge at its inception in 1991-reducing the industrygiant's $900 million annual domestic en ergy bill. Seven later ,DuPont 's annual energy costs are down to $800 million, and energyconsumption has shrunk by more than 8%. And the team is on tracktoward future reduction goals.Headed by Daniel J . Logan, Conoco Power's Southern EnergyAsset Team director , CELT is a network of about 30 employees fromall ar eas of DuPont who volunteer their knowledge, skills and timetoward attainment of energy excellence. Supported by upp er manage-ment , the group uses persuasion rather than mandates to further itsobjectives .Key to persuading the company was the team 's 1992 JumpStart commitment to reduce out-of-pocket energy expenditures im-mediately . "We said, 'Over a four-month peri od, we're going to save$6 million out-of-pock et on energy costs.' That was our goal ," Logansa ys . "We actually ended up doubling that . We saved over $12 mil-lion ."The gr eatest savings- 26% of the total- came from shuttingdown spare or unne eded equipment . Equipm ent tune-ups to improveperformance and renegotiation of fuel contracts also lowered energycost s.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

DuPont's Corporate Energy Leadership Team (CELT) faced adifficult challenge at its inception in 1991-reducing the industrygiant's $900 million annual domestic en ergy bill. Seven later ,DuPont 's annual energy costs are down to $800 million, and energyconsumption has shrunk by more than 8%. And the team is on tracktoward future reduction goals.Headed by Daniel J . Logan, Conoco Power's Southern EnergyAsset Team director , CELT is a network of about 30 employees fromall ar eas of DuPont who volunteer their knowledge, skills and timetoward attainment of energy excellence. Supported by upp er manage-ment , the group uses persuasion rather than mandates to further itsobjectives .Key to persuading the company was the team 's 1992 JumpStart commitment to reduce out-of-pocket energy expenditures im-mediately . "We said, 'Over a four-month peri od, we're going to save$6 million out-of-pock et on energy costs.' That was our goal ," Logansa ys . "We actually ended up doubling that . We saved over $12 mil-lion ."The gr eatest savings- 26% of the total- came from shuttingdown spare or unne eded equipment . Equipm ent tune-ups to improveperformance and renegotiation of fuel contracts also lowered energycost s.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

DuPont's Corporate Energy Leadership Team (CELT) faced adifficult challenge at its inception in 1991-reducing the industrygiant's $900 million annual domestic en ergy bill. Seven later ,DuPont 's annual energy costs are down to $800 million, and energyconsumption has shrunk by more than 8%. And the team is on tracktoward future reduction goals.Headed by Daniel J . Logan, Conoco Power's Southern EnergyAsset Team director , CELT is a network of about 30 employees fromall ar eas of DuPont who volunteer their knowledge, skills and timetoward attainment of energy excellence. Supported by upp er manage-ment , the group uses persuasion rather than mandates to further itsobjectives .Key to persuading the company was the team 's 1992 JumpStart commitment to reduce out-of-pocket energy expenditures im-mediately . "We said, 'Over a four-month peri od, we're going to save$6 million out-of-pock et on energy costs.' That was our goal ," Logansa ys . "We actually ended up doubling that . We saved over $12 mil-lion ."The gr eatest savings- 26% of the total- came from shuttingdown spare or unne eded equipment . Equipm ent tune-ups to improveperformance and renegotiation of fuel contracts also lowered energycost s.

Key concepts: Spare part, Energy consumption, Spare time, Consumption (sociology), Operations management, Business, Engineering, Energy conservation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DuPont Cuts Energy Consumption 8%- For Starters — Research Paper | ScholarLens