1996Unpublished venueRequires access

VICARIANCE AND DISPERSAL IN CARIBBEAN BIOGEOGRAPHY

S. Blair Hedges

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

The species diversity and phylogenetic relationships of West Indian vertebrates are incompletely known, but several lines of evidence support a dispersal origin for most of the fauna. Crother and Guyer have contested much of that evidence, claiming a far greater role for vicariance. However, it is shown here that none of their criticisms can be substantiated and their paper is dominated by inconsistencies. They have used the irrelevant evidence from intra-Caribbean vi- cariance events to address the origin of the fauna, failed to discriminate between old and new geologic syntheses by the same authors, chosen molecular estimates of divergence time randomly rather than with respect to phylogeny, attempted to diminish the consequences of a catastrophic event in Earth history (the K-T bolide impact), and have claimed to have discovered a congruent pattern of area relationships when in fact their proposed phylogenetic pattern is present in only a THE West Indies harbors a rich biota that has intrigued biogeographers for over a century. The numerous islands, some of which are of great age, and the complex geologic history of the region are factors that have influenced the evolutionary his- tories of these organisms to varying de- grees. In the two decades since Rosen (1975) proposed a vicariance model for Caribbean biogeography, attention has fo- cussed on determining the relative roles of vicariance and dispersal in the origin of the West Indian biota. The vicariance model proposes that the present biota rep- resents the fragmented remnants of an an- cient proto-Antillean biota that was con- tinuous with those of North and South America in the late Cretaceous. The al- ternative explanation is that over-water dispersal has been responsible for the or- igin of the West Indian biota (e.g., Pregill, 1981; Simpson, 1956). Hedges et al. (1992) tested these two hypotheses using estimates of amino acid sequence divergence in the protein serum albumin across a broad array of West In- dian terrestrial vertebrates: bufonid, hylid, eleutherodactyline, and leptodactyline frogs; anoline, iguanine, sphaerodactyline, tropidurine, teiid, and anguid lizards; am- phisbaenians; and alsophine and tropido- phiid snakes (inter-island divergences also

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The species diversity and phylogenetic relationships of West Indian vertebrates are incompletely known, but several lines of evidence support a dispersal origin for most of the fauna. Crother and Guyer have contested much of that evidence, claiming a far greater role for vicariance. However, it is shown here that none of their criticisms can be substantiated and their paper is dominated by inconsistencies. They have used the irrelevant evidence from intra-Caribbean vi- cariance events to address the origin of the fauna, failed to discriminate between old and new geologic syntheses by the same authors, chosen molecular estimates of divergence time randomly rather than with respect to phylogeny, attempted to diminish the consequences of a catastrophic event in Earth history (the K-T bolide impact), and have claimed to have discovered a congruent pattern of area relationships when in fact their proposed phylogenetic pattern is present in only a THE West Indies harbors a rich biota that has intrigued biogeographers for over a century. The numerous islands, some of which are of great age, and the complex geologic history of the region are factors that have influenced the evolutionary his- tories of these organisms to varying de- grees. In the two decades since Rosen (1975) proposed a vicariance model for Caribbean biogeography, attention has fo- cussed on determining the relative roles of vicariance and dispersal in the origin of the West Indian biota. The vicariance model proposes that the present biota rep- resents the fragmented remnants of an an- cient proto-Antillean biota that was con- tinuous with those of North and South America in the late Cretaceous. The al- ternative explanation is that over-water dispersal has been responsible for the or- igin of the West Indian biota (e.g., Pregill, 1981; Simpson, 1956). Hedges et al. (1992) tested these two hypotheses using estimates of amino acid sequence divergence in the protein serum albumin across a broad array of West In- dian terrestrial vertebrates: bufonid, hylid, eleutherodactyline, and leptodactyline frogs; anoline, iguanine, sphaerodactyline, tropidurine, teiid, and anguid lizards; am- phisbaenians; and alsophine and tropido- phiid snakes (inter-island divergences also

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The species diversity and phylogenetic relationships of West Indian vertebrates are incompletely known, but several lines of evidence support a dispersal origin for most of the fauna. Crother and Guyer have contested much of that evidence, claiming a far greater role for vicariance. However, it is shown here that none of their criticisms can be substantiated and their paper is dominated by inconsistencies. They have used the irrelevant evidence from intra-Caribbean vi- cariance events to address the origin of the fauna, failed to discriminate between old and new geologic syntheses by the same authors, chosen molecular estimates of divergence time randomly rather than with respect to phylogeny, attempted to diminish the consequences of a catastrophic event in Earth history (the K-T bolide impact), and have claimed to have discovered a congruent pattern of area relationships when in fact their proposed phylogenetic pattern is present in only a THE West Indies harbors a rich biota that has intrigued biogeographers for over a century. The numerous islands, some of which are of great age, and the complex geologic history of the region are factors that have influenced the evolutionary his- tories of these organisms to varying de- grees. In the two decades since Rosen (1975) proposed a vicariance model for Caribbean biogeography, attention has fo- cussed on determining the relative roles of vicariance and dispersal in the origin of the West Indian biota. The vicariance model proposes that the present biota rep- resents the fragmented remnants of an an- cient proto-Antillean biota that was con- tinuous with those of North and South America in the late Cretaceous. The al- ternative explanation is that over-water dispersal has been responsible for the or- igin of the West Indian biota (e.g., Pregill, 1981; Simpson, 1956). Hedges et al. (1992) tested these two hypotheses using estimates of amino acid sequence divergence in the protein serum albumin across a broad array of West In- dian terrestrial vertebrates: bufonid, hylid, eleutherodactyline, and leptodactyline frogs; anoline, iguanine, sphaerodactyline, tropidurine, teiid, and anguid lizards; am- phisbaenians; and alsophine and tropido- phiid snakes (inter-island divergences also

Key concepts: Vicariance, Biological dispersal, Biogeography, Biota, Land bridge, Fauna, Ecology, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
VICARIANCE AND DISPERSAL IN CARIBBEAN BIOGEOGRAPHY — Research Paper | ScholarLens