1994Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)Open access

Fine Tuning the Federal Government's Role in Public Broadcasting

Howard A. White

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 represented a major effort by the federal government to provide entertaining and enlightening programming unlike that being offered by major broadcasters. Central to this effort was the creation of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), an independent corporation whose mission was to facilitate diversity, creativity, and innovation in noncommercial public broadcasting. It was to achieve this goal without engaging in content control over programming. However, members of Congress have expressed concern over the types of programming CPB was funding. As a result, Congress in 1992 directed the CPB to define national programming standards for public broadcasting. The CPB was also directed to monitor stations' compliance with these standards and to condition future grant receipts on adequate compliance. The Author argues that CPB's enforcement of these programming standards infringes on the local stations' freedom of speech and restricts their ability to program for their local communities. The Author argues that CPB's role should be to provide grants for national programming to fill the gaps in the services offered by public broadcasting entities rather than dictate a national standard for programming.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 represented a major effort by the federal government to provide entertaining and enlightening programming unlike that being offered by major broadcasters. Central to this effort was the creation of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), an independent corporation whose mission was to facilitate diversity, creativity, and innovation in noncommercial public broadcasting. It was to achieve this goal without engaging in content control over programming. However, members of Congress have expressed concern over the types of programming CPB was funding. As a result, Congress in 1992 directed the CPB to define national programming standards for public broadcasting. The CPB was also directed to monitor stations' compliance with these standards and to condition future grant receipts on adequate compliance. The Author argues that CPB's enforcement of these programming standards infringes on the local stations' freedom of speech and restricts their ability to program for their local communities. The Author argues that CPB's role should be to provide grants for national programming to fill the gaps in the services offered by public broadcasting entities rather than dictate a national standard for programming.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 represented a major effort by the federal government to provide entertaining and enlightening programming unlike that being offered by major broadcasters. Central to this effort was the creation of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), an independent corporation whose mission was to facilitate diversity, creativity, and innovation in noncommercial public broadcasting. It was to achieve this goal without engaging in content control over programming. However, members of Congress have expressed concern over the types of programming CPB was funding. As a result, Congress in 1992 directed the CPB to define national programming standards for public broadcasting. The CPB was also directed to monitor stations' compliance with these standards and to condition future grant receipts on adequate compliance. The Author argues that CPB's enforcement of these programming standards infringes on the local stations' freedom of speech and restricts their ability to program for their local communities. The Author argues that CPB's role should be to provide grants for national programming to fill the gaps in the services offered by public broadcasting entities rather than dictate a national standard for programming.

Key concepts: Government (linguistics), Broadcasting (networking), Public broadcasting, Business, Telecommunications, Political science, Advertising, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fine Tuning the Federal Government's Role in Public Broadcasting — Research Paper | ScholarLens