2013Argumentation and AdvocacyRequires access

Comparisons of Ironic and Sarcastic Arguments in Terms of Appropriateness and Effectiveness in Personal Relationships

Joshua M. Averbeck

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Due to frequent confusion over what exactly an ironic argument is and how it differs from sarcasm, this study seeks to distinguish between irony and sarcasm in the interpersonal context. Conceptual differences are offered between irony and sarcasm, and literal, ironic, and sarcastic arguments are compared in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness. Results showed that sarcastic arguments were rated the least effective and least appropriate. Ironic arguments were rated moderately appropriate and most effective. The literal arguments were rated moderately effective and most appropriate. With these distinctions made between irony and sarcasm future directions are offered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Due to frequent confusion over what exactly an ironic argument is and how it differs from sarcasm, this study seeks to distinguish between irony and sarcasm in the interpersonal context. Conceptual differences are offered between irony and sarcasm, and literal, ironic, and sarcastic arguments are compared in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness. Results showed that sarcastic arguments were rated the least effective and least appropriate. Ironic arguments were rated moderately appropriate and most effective. The literal arguments were rated moderately effective and most appropriate. With these distinctions made between irony and sarcasm future directions are offered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Due to frequent confusion over what exactly an ironic argument is and how it differs from sarcasm, this study seeks to distinguish between irony and sarcasm in the interpersonal context. Conceptual differences are offered between irony and sarcasm, and literal, ironic, and sarcastic arguments are compared in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness. Results showed that sarcastic arguments were rated the least effective and least appropriate. Ironic arguments were rated moderately appropriate and most effective. The literal arguments were rated moderately effective and most appropriate. With these distinctions made between irony and sarcasm future directions are offered.

Key concepts: Sarcasm, Irony, Literal (mathematical logic), Argument (complex analysis), Confusion, Literal and figurative language, Psychology, Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparisons of Ironic and Sarcastic Arguments in Terms of Appropriateness and Effectiveness in Personal Relationships — Research Paper | ScholarLens