2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

On the undecidability of description and dynamic logics with recursion and counting

Piero A. Bonatti

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The evolution of Description Logics (DLs) and Propositional Dynamic Logics produced a hierarchy of decidable logics with multiple maximal elements. It would be desirable to combine different maximal logics into one super-logic, but then inference may turn out to be undecidable. Then it is important to characterize the decidability threshold for these logics. In this perspective, an interesting open question pointed out by Sattler and Vardi [Sattler and Vardi, 1999] is whether inference in a hybrid μ-calculus with restricted forms of graded modalities is decidable, and which complexity class it belongs to. In this paper we prove that this calculus and the corresponding are undecidable. Second, we prove undecidability results for logics that support both a transitive closure operator over roles and number restrictions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The evolution of Description Logics (DLs) and Propositional Dynamic Logics produced a hierarchy of decidable logics with multiple maximal elements. It would be desirable to combine different maximal logics into one super-logic, but then inference may turn out to be undecidable. Then it is important to characterize the decidability threshold for these logics. In this perspective, an interesting open question pointed out by Sattler and Vardi [Sattler and Vardi, 1999] is whether inference in a hybrid μ-calculus with restricted forms of graded modalities is decidable, and which complexity class it belongs to. In this paper we prove that this calculus and the corresponding are undecidable. Second, we prove undecidability results for logics that support both a transitive closure operator over roles and number restrictions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The evolution of Description Logics (DLs) and Propositional Dynamic Logics produced a hierarchy of decidable logics with multiple maximal elements. It would be desirable to combine different maximal logics into one super-logic, but then inference may turn out to be undecidable. Then it is important to characterize the decidability threshold for these logics. In this perspective, an interesting open question pointed out by Sattler and Vardi [Sattler and Vardi, 1999] is whether inference in a hybrid μ-calculus with restricted forms of graded modalities is decidable, and which complexity class it belongs to. In this paper we prove that this calculus and the corresponding are undecidable. Second, we prove undecidability results for logics that support both a transitive closure operator over roles and number restrictions.

Key concepts: Undecidable problem, Decidability, T-norm fuzzy logics, Mathematics, Discrete mathematics, Recursion (computer science), Computer science, Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the undecidability of description and dynamic logics with recursion and counting — Research Paper | ScholarLens