1976PubMedOpen access

Acquired resistance to ticks. I. Passive transfer of resistance.

Stephen K. Wikel, John R. Allen

Open full text 122 citations

Abstract

Guinea-pigs developed resistance to larvae of the ixodid tick, Dermacentor andersoni, after one infestation. Resistance was characterized by guinea-pigs allowing fewer larvae to engorge (5-15%) during a second exposure than during an initial infestation (70-90%). Larvae feeding on resistant hosts weighed less than larvae engorging on a host with no previous exposure to ticks. Evidence is presented which indicates that this resistance can be passively transferred with viable lymph node cells, but not with serum, from resistant guinea-pigs. Recipients of cells from such resistant animals allowed significantly fewer larvae to engorge than did controls previously unexposed to ticks. This was not so in recipients of immune serum. The protection provided by passive transfer of cells from a resistant donor was not as complete as the protection afforded by natural exposure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Guinea-pigs developed resistance to larvae of the ixodid tick, Dermacentor andersoni, after one infestation. Resistance was characterized by guinea-pigs allowing fewer larvae to engorge (5-15%) during a second exposure than during an initial infestation (70-90%). Larvae feeding on resistant hosts weighed less than larvae engorging on a host with no previous exposure to ticks. Evidence is presented which indicates that this resistance can be passively transferred with viable lymph node cells, but not with serum, from resistant guinea-pigs. Recipients of cells from such resistant animals allowed significantly fewer larvae to engorge than did controls previously unexposed to ticks. This was not so in recipients of immune serum. The protection provided by passive transfer of cells from a resistant donor was not as complete as the protection afforded by natural exposure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 122 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Guinea-pigs developed resistance to larvae of the ixodid tick, Dermacentor andersoni, after one infestation. Resistance was characterized by guinea-pigs allowing fewer larvae to engorge (5-15%) during a second exposure than during an initial infestation (70-90%). Larvae feeding on resistant hosts weighed less than larvae engorging on a host with no previous exposure to ticks. Evidence is presented which indicates that this resistance can be passively transferred with viable lymph node cells, but not with serum, from resistant guinea-pigs. Recipients of cells from such resistant animals allowed significantly fewer larvae to engorge than did controls previously unexposed to ticks. This was not so in recipients of immune serum. The protection provided by passive transfer of cells from a resistant donor was not as complete as the protection afforded by natural exposure.

Key concepts: Biology, Infestation, Larva, Tick, Veterinary medicine, Guinea pig, Tick infestation, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Acquired resistance to ticks. I. Passive transfer of resistance. — Research Paper | ScholarLens