Detecting ambiguity: an example in knowledge evaluation
Donald Loveland, Marco Valtorta
Abstract
Donald Loveland, Marco Valtorta
Abstract
Expert systems have been developed around one expert partly because the expert has been totally responsible for the soundness of the knowledge base. Without strong aids to help ensure soundness in building expert systems, we must rely on the soundness of the mature cohesiveness of a human expert. As knowledge bases grow this mature expertise will not be adequate. We propose a new method (for expert systems) to aid the expert in knowledge evaluation within the rule-based system setting. We consider the problem of ambiguity within a classification system as an example of the proposed technique.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Expert systems have been developed around one expert partly because the expert has been totally responsible for the soundness of the knowledge base. Without strong aids to help ensure soundness in building expert systems, we must rely on the soundness of the mature cohesiveness of a human expert. As knowledge bases grow this mature expertise will not be adequate. We propose a new method (for expert systems) to aid the expert in knowledge evaluation within the rule-based system setting. We consider the problem of ambiguity within a classification system as an example of the proposed technique.
Key concepts: Soundness, Expert system, Ambiguity, Computer science, Knowledge base, Knowledge-based systems, Legal expert system, Subject-matter expert