1999PubMedRequires access

Coping strategies and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer.

Adelaida Zabalegui

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between coping mechanisms and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study. SETTING: Private and public hospitals in New York, NY. SAMPLE: 132 patients, ages 33-83, with advanced breast, ovarian, lung, colorectal, or other cancers. METHODS: Mail survey using the Ways of Coping Inventory-Cancer Version and the Profile of Mood States. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Coping strategies, psychological distress. FINDINGS: The coping strategies distancing, cognitive escape-avoidance, and behavioral escape-avoidance were related to psychological distress. Distancing was negatively related (r = -0.25) and cognitive escape-avoidance (r = 0.38) and behavioral escape-avoidance (r = 0.38) were positively related to psychological distress (p < 0.01). Collectively, the coping strategies explained 36% of the variance of psychological distress. The most important coping mechanism contributing to overall psychological distress was behavioral escape-avoidance, followed by cognitive escape-avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of psychological distress were associated with low levels of cognitive and behavioral escape-avoidance and high levels of distancing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nursing interventions that reduce cognitive and behavioral escape-avoidance and enhance distancing should be tested, through further research, in relation to their ability to decrease psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between coping mechanisms and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study. SETTING: Private and public hospitals in New York, NY. SAMPLE: 132 patients, ages 33-83, with advanced breast, ovarian, lung, colorectal, or other cancers. METHODS: Mail survey using the Ways of Coping Inventory-Cancer Version and the Profile of Mood States. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Coping strategies, psychological distress. FINDINGS: The coping strategies distancing, cognitive escape-avoidance, and behavioral escape-avoidance were related to psychological distress. Distancing was negatively related (r = -0.25) and cognitive escape-avoidance (r = 0.38) and behavioral escape-avoidance (r = 0.38) were positively related to psychological distress (p < 0.01). Collectively, the coping strategies explained 36% of the variance of psychological distress. The most important coping mechanism contributing to overall psychological distress was behavioral escape-avoidance, followed by cognitive escape-avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of psychological distress were associated with low levels of cognitive and behavioral escape-avoidance and high levels of distancing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nursing interventions that reduce cognitive and behavioral escape-avoidance and enhance distancing should be tested, through further research, in relation to their ability to decrease psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between coping mechanisms and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study. SETTING: Private and public hospitals in New York, NY. SAMPLE: 132 patients, ages 33-83, with advanced breast, ovarian, lung, colorectal, or other cancers. METHODS: Mail survey using the Ways of Coping Inventory-Cancer Version and the Profile of Mood States. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Coping strategies, psychological distress. FINDINGS: The coping strategies distancing, cognitive escape-avoidance, and behavioral escape-avoidance were related to psychological distress. Distancing was negatively related (r = -0.25) and cognitive escape-avoidance (r = 0.38) and behavioral escape-avoidance (r = 0.38) were positively related to psychological distress (p < 0.01). Collectively, the coping strategies explained 36% of the variance of psychological distress. The most important coping mechanism contributing to overall psychological distress was behavioral escape-avoidance, followed by cognitive escape-avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of psychological distress were associated with low levels of cognitive and behavioral escape-avoidance and high levels of distancing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nursing interventions that reduce cognitive and behavioral escape-avoidance and enhance distancing should be tested, through further research, in relation to their ability to decrease psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer.

Key concepts: Avoidance coping, Distancing, Coping (psychology), Distress, Clinical psychology, Cognition, Medicine, Psychological intervention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coping strategies and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer. — Research Paper | ScholarLens