2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Reasons of interruption occurred in the interviews conducted by Ira Koesno in SCTV's Liputan 6

Yulia Nyoto

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

My study deals with conversational analysis that is particularly focused on interruption. Interruption is a violation toward the general rule of the conversation. The writer believes that an interruption caused by a certain reason. Conducting this study, the writer is curious to know the reason of interruption led by Ira Koesno. Therefore, the writer consults with the theory of Zimmerman and west (1975), in which reasons of interruption are classified according to Linguistic category. By discovering reasons of the interruption in the interviews, this thesis is also showing the most committed reasons of interruption, especially in an interactive TV dialog. There are two parties in this dialog, namely interviewer and interviewee (guest). Specifically, this study discusses about the interruption uttered by interviewer, Ira Koesno. Moreover, this study is a qualitative study and the writer collected the data from the transcript, which she did it manually. The writer classified all interruption from the interviewer occurred in the shows and analyzed the reason. To justified the reason of interruption, the writer look at the context of the discussion between the interviewer and the interviewee (guest). The result of this analysis shows that the main reason of interruption was Seeking Clarification, and the other reasons were Dissatisfaction, Concluding, Challenging, Showing Agreement, and Completing, Giving Support and Maintaining the Topic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

My study deals with conversational analysis that is particularly focused on interruption. Interruption is a violation toward the general rule of the conversation. The writer believes that an interruption caused by a certain reason. Conducting this study, the writer is curious to know the reason of interruption led by Ira Koesno. Therefore, the writer consults with the theory of Zimmerman and west (1975), in which reasons of interruption are classified according to Linguistic category. By discovering reasons of the interruption in the interviews, this thesis is also showing the most committed reasons of interruption, especially in an interactive TV dialog. There are two parties in this dialog, namely interviewer and interviewee (guest). Specifically, this study discusses about the interruption uttered by interviewer, Ira Koesno. Moreover, this study is a qualitative study and the writer collected the data from the transcript, which she did it manually. The writer classified all interruption from the interviewer occurred in the shows and analyzed the reason. To justified the reason of interruption, the writer look at the context of the discussion between the interviewer and the interviewee (guest). The result of this analysis shows that the main reason of interruption was Seeking Clarification, and the other reasons were Dissatisfaction, Concluding, Challenging, Showing Agreement, and Completing, Giving Support and Maintaining the Topic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

My study deals with conversational analysis that is particularly focused on interruption. Interruption is a violation toward the general rule of the conversation. The writer believes that an interruption caused by a certain reason. Conducting this study, the writer is curious to know the reason of interruption led by Ira Koesno. Therefore, the writer consults with the theory of Zimmerman and west (1975), in which reasons of interruption are classified according to Linguistic category. By discovering reasons of the interruption in the interviews, this thesis is also showing the most committed reasons of interruption, especially in an interactive TV dialog. There are two parties in this dialog, namely interviewer and interviewee (guest). Specifically, this study discusses about the interruption uttered by interviewer, Ira Koesno. Moreover, this study is a qualitative study and the writer collected the data from the transcript, which she did it manually. The writer classified all interruption from the interviewer occurred in the shows and analyzed the reason. To justified the reason of interruption, the writer look at the context of the discussion between the interviewer and the interviewee (guest). The result of this analysis shows that the main reason of interruption was Seeking Clarification, and the other reasons were Dissatisfaction, Concluding, Challenging, Showing Agreement, and Completing, Giving Support and Maintaining the Topic.

Key concepts: Interview, Conversation, Dialog box, Context (archaeology), Conversation analysis, Psychology, Social psychology, Qualitative research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reasons of interruption occurred in the interviews conducted by Ira Koesno in SCTV's Liputan 6 — Research Paper | ScholarLens