1980PubMedRequires access

Delayed hard palate repair and speech deficiencies: a cautionary report.

Bard C. Cosman, Falk As

Open publisher page 85 citations

Abstract

In the management of patients with complete palatal clefts early repair of the soft palate (before 1 year of age) and delayed repair of the hard palate (after five or six years of age) has been advocated on the basis that good speech will develop following soft palate closure and that avoidance of trauma to the hard palate will obviate maxillary growth disturbance. In addition, it is said that many of the remaining hard palate fistulas will close spontaneously and that residual hard palate openings will be easy to close. Thirty-two cases treated in this way are reviewed, and a decade of experience with this technique is presented. A majority of cases failed to develop acceptable speech spontaneously. A very high percentage suffered both anterior and posterior air escape and a strikingly high proportion required pharyngeal flaps. Spontaneous complete closure of the hard palate was infrequent. The hard palate openings were not easy to close. The speech deficiencies associated with this technique are clear. The method's possible advantages in relationship to maxillofacial growth remain difficult to prove and were not specifically investigated in this study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the management of patients with complete palatal clefts early repair of the soft palate (before 1 year of age) and delayed repair of the hard palate (after five or six years of age) has been advocated on the basis that good speech will develop following soft palate closure and that avoidance of trauma to the hard palate will obviate maxillary growth disturbance. In addition, it is said that many of the remaining hard palate fistulas will close spontaneously and that residual hard palate openings will be easy to close. Thirty-two cases treated in this way are reviewed, and a decade of experience with this technique is presented. A majority of cases failed to develop acceptable speech spontaneously. A very high percentage suffered both anterior and posterior air escape and a strikingly high proportion required pharyngeal flaps. Spontaneous complete closure of the hard palate was infrequent. The hard palate openings were not easy to close. The speech deficiencies associated with this technique are clear. The method's possible advantages in relationship to maxillofacial growth remain difficult to prove and were not specifically investigated in this study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 85 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the management of patients with complete palatal clefts early repair of the soft palate (before 1 year of age) and delayed repair of the hard palate (after five or six years of age) has been advocated on the basis that good speech will develop following soft palate closure and that avoidance of trauma to the hard palate will obviate maxillary growth disturbance. In addition, it is said that many of the remaining hard palate fistulas will close spontaneously and that residual hard palate openings will be easy to close. Thirty-two cases treated in this way are reviewed, and a decade of experience with this technique is presented. A majority of cases failed to develop acceptable speech spontaneously. A very high percentage suffered both anterior and posterior air escape and a strikingly high proportion required pharyngeal flaps. Spontaneous complete closure of the hard palate was infrequent. The hard palate openings were not easy to close. The speech deficiencies associated with this technique are clear. The method's possible advantages in relationship to maxillofacial growth remain difficult to prove and were not specifically investigated in this study.

Key concepts: Soft palate, Hard palate, Medicine, Closure (psychology), Pharyngeal flap, Dentistry, Secondary palate, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Delayed hard palate repair and speech deficiencies: a cautionary report. — Research Paper | ScholarLens