2004Arts Education Policy ReviewRequires access

Spirit, Mind, and Body: Arts Education the Redeemer

Constance Bumgarner Gee

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

A large number of public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private sector companies are engaged in arts and arts education advocacy campaigns. A broad range of assertions about the capacity of the arts to assist in spiritual and moral development, improve academic performance, and induce psychological and even physiological well-being are used to promote support for all types of arts and arts education programming. Federal arts groups characterize the services of artists and arts organizations as being indispensable to successful school-based arts instruction. This chapter analyzes the interests of various arts groups in arts education, the motivations behind various advocacy claims, and the likely repercussions of hard-driving marketing on K-12 arts education. The author concludes that state and municipal commitment to K-12 arts education will further erode as a direct result of failure to distinguish between the purposes and capabilities of schools and those of arts organizations with regard to student learning in the arts. The responsibilities and jurisdiction of schools must be delineated clearly and firmly, the outcome of which must be assured support for programs and research designed specifically for the advancement of school-based arts study. Arts educators are urged to proclaim those distinctions in the public arena just as they also must differentiate between more and less credible arts education advocacy claims.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A large number of public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private sector companies are engaged in arts and arts education advocacy campaigns. A broad range of assertions about the capacity of the arts to assist in spiritual and moral development, improve academic performance, and induce psychological and even physiological well-being are used to promote support for all types of arts and arts education programming. Federal arts groups characterize the services of artists and arts organizations as being indispensable to successful school-based arts instruction. This chapter analyzes the interests of various arts groups in arts education, the motivations behind various advocacy claims, and the likely repercussions of hard-driving marketing on K-12 arts education. The author concludes that state and municipal commitment to K-12 arts education will further erode as a direct result of failure to distinguish between the purposes and capabilities of schools and those of arts organizations with regard to student learning in the arts. The responsibilities and jurisdiction of schools must be delineated clearly and firmly, the outcome of which must be assured support for programs and research designed specifically for the advancement of school-based arts study. Arts educators are urged to proclaim those distinctions in the public arena just as they also must differentiate between more and less credible arts education advocacy claims.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A large number of public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private sector companies are engaged in arts and arts education advocacy campaigns. A broad range of assertions about the capacity of the arts to assist in spiritual and moral development, improve academic performance, and induce psychological and even physiological well-being are used to promote support for all types of arts and arts education programming. Federal arts groups characterize the services of artists and arts organizations as being indispensable to successful school-based arts instruction. This chapter analyzes the interests of various arts groups in arts education, the motivations behind various advocacy claims, and the likely repercussions of hard-driving marketing on K-12 arts education. The author concludes that state and municipal commitment to K-12 arts education will further erode as a direct result of failure to distinguish between the purposes and capabilities of schools and those of arts organizations with regard to student learning in the arts. The responsibilities and jurisdiction of schools must be delineated clearly and firmly, the outcome of which must be assured support for programs and research designed specifically for the advancement of school-based arts study. Arts educators are urged to proclaim those distinctions in the public arena just as they also must differentiate between more and less credible arts education advocacy claims.

Key concepts: The arts, Arts in education, Performing arts education, Visual arts education, Sociology, Public relations, Private sector, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spirit, Mind, and Body: Arts Education the Redeemer — Research Paper | ScholarLens