1972PubMedOpen access

International collaborative studies on potency assays of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.

J. D. van Ramshorst, Tilak Sundaresan, A. S. Outschoorn

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

Collaborative studies showed that relative potency assays for a particular type of diphtheria toxoid (adsorbed) and for tetanus toxoid (plain and adsorbed) gave very similar results, whether the assays were carried out by toxin challenge or by antitoxin titration after immunization of experimental animals with graded doses of toxoid. The same numerical results were obtained with a scoring system as with a system based on survivals only. Although skin tests were used on a very limited scale in these studies, it seems likely that they could replace lethal tests for the diphtheria challenge assays.For both tetanus and diphtheria, the adsorbed toxoid gave a higher relative potency when combined with other antigens than as a single toxoid. Both mice and guinea-pigs were used for the lethal challenge test of adsorbed tetanus toxoid. For the single tetanus toxoid the results were the same, but for the combined toxoid (DPT vaccine) the mouse assay results were about twice those of guinea-pig assays.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Collaborative studies showed that relative potency assays for a particular type of diphtheria toxoid (adsorbed) and for tetanus toxoid (plain and adsorbed) gave very similar results, whether the assays were carried out by toxin challenge or by antitoxin titration after immunization of experimental animals with graded doses of toxoid. The same numerical results were obtained with a scoring system as with a system based on survivals only. Although skin tests were used on a very limited scale in these studies, it seems likely that they could replace lethal tests for the diphtheria challenge assays.For both tetanus and diphtheria, the adsorbed toxoid gave a higher relative potency when combined with other antigens than as a single toxoid. Both mice and guinea-pigs were used for the lethal challenge test of adsorbed tetanus toxoid. For the single tetanus toxoid the results were the same, but for the combined toxoid (DPT vaccine) the mouse assay results were about twice those of guinea-pig assays.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Collaborative studies showed that relative potency assays for a particular type of diphtheria toxoid (adsorbed) and for tetanus toxoid (plain and adsorbed) gave very similar results, whether the assays were carried out by toxin challenge or by antitoxin titration after immunization of experimental animals with graded doses of toxoid. The same numerical results were obtained with a scoring system as with a system based on survivals only. Although skin tests were used on a very limited scale in these studies, it seems likely that they could replace lethal tests for the diphtheria challenge assays.For both tetanus and diphtheria, the adsorbed toxoid gave a higher relative potency when combined with other antigens than as a single toxoid. Both mice and guinea-pigs were used for the lethal challenge test of adsorbed tetanus toxoid. For the single tetanus toxoid the results were the same, but for the combined toxoid (DPT vaccine) the mouse assay results were about twice those of guinea-pig assays.

Key concepts: Toxoid, Tetanus, Potency, Diphtheria, Diphtheria toxin, Antitoxin, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International collaborative studies on potency assays of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. — Research Paper | ScholarLens