2011•PubMedRequires access

Barriers to adolescent girls' participation in physical activity defined by physical activity levels.

Javier Zaragoza Casterad, Eduardo Generelo, J A Julián, A Abarca-Sos

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

AIM: Perceived barriers were the single most powerful predictors of a change in health behaviours and the most consistent negative correlate of children's actual physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to compare the perceived barriers of physical activity in 714 adolescent girls defined by physical activity levels. METHODS: The final sample consisted of 714 adolescent, student girls. The age of these students ranged from 12 to 15 years, with a mean age of 13.5 ± 0.7 years. Perceived physical activity and perceived barriers to physical activity were measured using the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire and a Scale of Barriers that includes 17 units of barriers divided into two categories: intrapersonal barriers and environmental/contextual barriers. RESULTS: In our study, girls with a low activity level perceived a greater number of barriers than those with a high activity level, more specifically three intrapersonal barriers and two environmental/contextual barriers. Girls with a low activity level reported greater barriers to physical activity than high-active girls for these barriers: don't like physical activity (F=23.405, p=0.001), not good at physical activity and sports (F=24.160, p=0.001), I'm too lazy to do physical activity (F=8.415, P=0.001), it is not safe to do physical activity outdoors (F=11.39, P<0.001) and there is no-one to do physical activity with (F=15.22 P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows the need to learn and effectively use time management strategies that emphasize prioritising and better scheduling of physical activities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: Perceived barriers were the single most powerful predictors of a change in health behaviours and the most consistent negative correlate of children's actual physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to compare the perceived barriers of physical activity in 714 adolescent girls defined by physical activity levels. METHODS: The final sample consisted of 714 adolescent, student girls. The age of these students ranged from 12 to 15 years, with a mean age of 13.5 ± 0.7 years. Perceived physical activity and perceived barriers to physical activity were measured using the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire and a Scale of Barriers that includes 17 units of barriers divided into two categories: intrapersonal barriers and environmental/contextual barriers. RESULTS: In our study, girls with a low activity level perceived a greater number of barriers than those with a high activity level, more specifically three intrapersonal barriers and two environmental/contextual barriers. Girls with a low activity level reported greater barriers to physical activity than high-active girls for these barriers: don't like physical activity (F=23.405, p=0.001), not good at physical activity and sports (F=24.160, p=0.001), I'm too lazy to do physical activity (F=8.415, P=0.001), it is not safe to do physical activity outdoors (F=11.39, P<0.001) and there is no-one to do physical activity with (F=15.22 P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows the need to learn and effectively use time management strategies that emphasize prioritising and better scheduling of physical activities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: Perceived barriers were the single most powerful predictors of a change in health behaviours and the most consistent negative correlate of children's actual physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to compare the perceived barriers of physical activity in 714 adolescent girls defined by physical activity levels. METHODS: The final sample consisted of 714 adolescent, student girls. The age of these students ranged from 12 to 15 years, with a mean age of 13.5 ± 0.7 years. Perceived physical activity and perceived barriers to physical activity were measured using the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire and a Scale of Barriers that includes 17 units of barriers divided into two categories: intrapersonal barriers and environmental/contextual barriers. RESULTS: In our study, girls with a low activity level perceived a greater number of barriers than those with a high activity level, more specifically three intrapersonal barriers and two environmental/contextual barriers. Girls with a low activity level reported greater barriers to physical activity than high-active girls for these barriers: don't like physical activity (F=23.405, p=0.001), not good at physical activity and sports (F=24.160, p=0.001), I'm too lazy to do physical activity (F=8.415, P=0.001), it is not safe to do physical activity outdoors (F=11.39, P<0.001) and there is no-one to do physical activity with (F=15.22 P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows the need to learn and effectively use time management strategies that emphasize prioritising and better scheduling of physical activities.

Key concepts: Intrapersonal communication, Physical activity, Psychology, Scale (ratio), Physical activity level, Developmental psychology, Medicine, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Barriers to adolescent girls' participation in physical activity defined by physical activity levels. — Research Paper | ScholarLens