2004Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)Requires access

Comparison of the Q-routing and shortest path routing algorithm

Firat Tekiner, Zabih Ghassemlooy, T. Srikanth

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the self-adaptive QRouting and dual reinforcement Q-Routing algorithms with the conventional shortest path routing algorithm. The Q-Routing algorithm embeds a learning policy at every node to adapt itself to the changing network conditions, which leads to a synchronised routing information, in order to achieve a shortest delivery time. Unlike Q-Routing, the shortest path routing algorithm routes the packets based on the link with the least delay irrespective of the traffic pattern on the link. Here simulations are carried out under problematic conditions by taking into account the node and link failures. Results show that the adaptive (learning) approach performed better than the traditional non-adaptive approach under problematic conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, we compare the self-adaptive QRouting and dual reinforcement Q-Routing algorithms with the conventional shortest path routing algorithm. The Q-Routing algorithm embeds a learning policy at every node to adapt itself to the changing network conditions, which leads to a synchronised routing information, in order to achieve a shortest delivery time. Unlike Q-Routing, the shortest path routing algorithm routes the packets based on the link with the least delay irrespective of the traffic pattern on the link. Here simulations are carried out under problematic conditions by taking into account the node and link failures. Results show that the adaptive (learning) approach performed better than the traditional non-adaptive approach under problematic conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, we compare the self-adaptive QRouting and dual reinforcement Q-Routing algorithms with the conventional shortest path routing algorithm. The Q-Routing algorithm embeds a learning policy at every node to adapt itself to the changing network conditions, which leads to a synchronised routing information, in order to achieve a shortest delivery time. Unlike Q-Routing, the shortest path routing algorithm routes the packets based on the link with the least delay irrespective of the traffic pattern on the link. Here simulations are carried out under problematic conditions by taking into account the node and link failures. Results show that the adaptive (learning) approach performed better than the traditional non-adaptive approach under problematic conditions.

Key concepts: Equal-cost multi-path routing, Link-state routing protocol, Static routing, Path vector protocol, Computer science, K shortest path routing, Multipath routing, Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Q-routing and shortest path routing algorithm — Research Paper | ScholarLens