Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid.
Mark Clement Armstrong, P. Pegg, Christopher J. James, Peter J. Blamey
Abstract
Mark Clement Armstrong, P. Pegg, Christopher J. James, Peter J. Blamey
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the perception of speech in quiet and in noise by adults using a cochlear implant on its own or a cochlear implant and hearing aid together. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures. SETTING: Laboratory study using subjects' own speech processors. PATIENTS: Two groups of cochlear implant users (Australian and American) with some residual hearing in the non-implanted ear (pure tone average thresholds at 500 Hz, 1 kHz, and 2 kHz of 75-112 dB HL). INTERVENTION(S): Conventional hearing aid and cochlear implant in opposite ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception was evaluated using recorded lists of CUNY sentences and lists of CNC words in quiet and in background noise. RESULTS: Speech scores were significantly higher with implant and hearing aid together compared to implant alone. The binaural advantage was greater in background noise than it was in quiet for CUNY sentences in the American listeners. CONCLUSION: Severely-to-profoundly hearing impaired adults may benefit from combined fitting of implants and conventional hearing aids in opposite ears.
OpenAlex reports 131 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the perception of speech in quiet and in noise by adults using a cochlear implant on its own or a cochlear implant and hearing aid together. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures. SETTING: Laboratory study using subjects' own speech processors. PATIENTS: Two groups of cochlear implant users (Australian and American) with some residual hearing in the non-implanted ear (pure tone average thresholds at 500 Hz, 1 kHz, and 2 kHz of 75-112 dB HL). INTERVENTION(S): Conventional hearing aid and cochlear implant in opposite ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception was evaluated using recorded lists of CUNY sentences and lists of CNC words in quiet and in background noise. RESULTS: Speech scores were significantly higher with implant and hearing aid together compared to implant alone. The binaural advantage was greater in background noise than it was in quiet for CUNY sentences in the American listeners. CONCLUSION: Severely-to-profoundly hearing impaired adults may benefit from combined fitting of implants and conventional hearing aids in opposite ears.
Key concepts: Cochlear implant, Audiology, QUIET, Speech perception, Hearing aid, Medicine, Implant, Noise (video)