2014RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library)Requires access

Creative practice, research ethics and the doctoral thesis

Barbara Bolt, MacNeil, Kate, Pia Ednie‐Brown

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In the 1990's, reforms in the Australian higher-education sector brought post-secondary training in the creative arts into the context of university education (Baker & Buckley 2009). One consequence of this shift from training institution to research institution was the expectation that artists-as-academics produce research outputs and that the creative arts would develop a tradition of doctoral candidates and research . Reframing creative arts as research meant that art-as-research, like all research in the academy, became answerable to the university ethics processes and procedures. Without a history of their own to negotiate the ethics system, the creative arts, in particular the visual arts, looked to the extensive work on visual ethics in the fields of visual anthropology, geography and sociology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the 1990's, reforms in the Australian higher-education sector brought post-secondary training in the creative arts into the context of university education (Baker & Buckley 2009). One consequence of this shift from training institution to research institution was the expectation that artists-as-academics produce research outputs and that the creative arts would develop a tradition of doctoral candidates and research . Reframing creative arts as research meant that art-as-research, like all research in the academy, became answerable to the university ethics processes and procedures. Without a history of their own to negotiate the ethics system, the creative arts, in particular the visual arts, looked to the extensive work on visual ethics in the fields of visual anthropology, geography and sociology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the 1990's, reforms in the Australian higher-education sector brought post-secondary training in the creative arts into the context of university education (Baker & Buckley 2009). One consequence of this shift from training institution to research institution was the expectation that artists-as-academics produce research outputs and that the creative arts would develop a tradition of doctoral candidates and research . Reframing creative arts as research meant that art-as-research, like all research in the academy, became answerable to the university ethics processes and procedures. Without a history of their own to negotiate the ethics system, the creative arts, in particular the visual arts, looked to the extensive work on visual ethics in the fields of visual anthropology, geography and sociology.

Key concepts: The arts, Cognitive reframing, Institution, Sociology, Context (archaeology), Negotiation, Arts in education, Higher education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Creative practice, research ethics and the doctoral thesis — Research Paper | ScholarLens