The Hietaharju PGE-enriched komatiite-hosted sulfide deposit in the Archean Suomussalmi greenstone belt, eastern Finland

The Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit occurs in the Archean Suomussalmi greenstone belt of eastern Finland and is associated with high-Mg basalts and low-Mg komatiitic rocks. It represents a PGE-enriched type among komatiite-related Ni–Cu deposits. The Hietaharju deposit consists of several mineralized lenses in highly altered olivine–pyroxene cumulates (i.e., talc–carbonate–chlorite rocks) and contains disseminated, massive to semi-massive and brecciated sulfides. Post-magmatic processes have not significantly changed the primary magmatic sulfide assemblage (i.e., pyrrhotite–pentlandite–chalcopyrite), but has modified sulfide textures and possibly remobilized and reconcentrated the sulfides. Though the deposit is currently subeconomic, it has high PGE contents in the sulfide fraction, averaging 5.7 ppm Pd and 2 ppm Pt (average of all ore types), being highest in disseminated sulfides. The parental magma represents an intermediate type between Al-undepleted and Al-depleted komatiites and differs from most other komatiitic rocks in the Tipasjärvi–Kuhmo–Suomussalmi greenstone belt complex, which are normally of the Al-undepleted type. The relatively fractionated nature of the komatiitic basalt parental magma of the Hietaharju deposit is consistent with the low Ni/Cu (< 4) and Ni/Co (< 18) and high Pd/Ir (< 25) ratios of the sulfide fraction, similar to the values in the Paleoproterozoic Raglan belt deposits, Canada. Use of REE for constraining crustal contamination is hampered by the highly altered nature of komatiitic rocks in the Hietaharju area. Sulfides in the country rock metasediments that host the Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit show clear mass-independent sulfur isotope fractionation (MIF-S) consistent with their age and published S isotope data from the Suomussalmi belt. In contrast, sulfides of the Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit only possess a small degree of MIF-S, providing limited direct evidence for the role of local metasedimentary sulfur in ore formation. Archean base metal sulfide mineralization is among the potential sources of sulfur, however, and, as shown by the epithermal Taivaljärvi Au–Ag–Zn deposit, can have mass-independent sulfur isotope fractionation that is similar in magnitude and sign to that of the Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit.