2013Unpublished venueRequires access

On So‐Called “Pronouns” in English, 1966

Raffaella Zanuttini, Thomas Leu, Richard Kayne

Open publisher page 168 citations

Abstract

Postal's proposal can be broken down into three main components. The first is that what we call pronouns are not in fact a subtype of noun. The second is that pronouns are a subtype of determiner, closely related to definite articles. The third is that pronouns, though not themselves nouns, are followed by a noun that is usually not pronounced. This chapter provides informal discussion of certain regularities in the syntactic behavior of forms traditionally called ‘pronouns’ in discussions of English syntax. In a transformational grammar, each sentence and hence, derivatively, each part of each sentence has two distinct syntactic structures as part of its overall grammatical description; a highly abstract Deep structure relevant for semantic interpretation and a Surface structure relevant for phonetic interpretation. These two aspects of syntactic form are in general connected by a long and complex chain of transformational rules which, furthermore, derive a sequence of intermediate forms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Postal's proposal can be broken down into three main components. The first is that what we call pronouns are not in fact a subtype of noun. The second is that pronouns are a subtype of determiner, closely related to definite articles. The third is that pronouns, though not themselves nouns, are followed by a noun that is usually not pronounced. This chapter provides informal discussion of certain regularities in the syntactic behavior of forms traditionally called ‘pronouns’ in discussions of English syntax. In a transformational grammar, each sentence and hence, derivatively, each part of each sentence has two distinct syntactic structures as part of its overall grammatical description; a highly abstract Deep structure relevant for semantic interpretation and a Surface structure relevant for phonetic interpretation. These two aspects of syntactic form are in general connected by a long and complex chain of transformational rules which, furthermore, derive a sequence of intermediate forms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 168 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Postal's proposal can be broken down into three main components. The first is that what we call pronouns are not in fact a subtype of noun. The second is that pronouns are a subtype of determiner, closely related to definite articles. The third is that pronouns, though not themselves nouns, are followed by a noun that is usually not pronounced. This chapter provides informal discussion of certain regularities in the syntactic behavior of forms traditionally called ‘pronouns’ in discussions of English syntax. In a transformational grammar, each sentence and hence, derivatively, each part of each sentence has two distinct syntactic structures as part of its overall grammatical description; a highly abstract Deep structure relevant for semantic interpretation and a Surface structure relevant for phonetic interpretation. These two aspects of syntactic form are in general connected by a long and complex chain of transformational rules which, furthermore, derive a sequence of intermediate forms.

Key concepts: Determiner, Nominative case, Linguistics, Noun, Personal pronoun, Noun phrase, Determiner phrase, Reflexive pronoun

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On So‐Called “Pronouns” in English, 1966 — Research Paper | ScholarLens