2006Energy Studies ReviewOpen access

The Dynamics of Risk Premiums in Nord Pool's Futures Market

Erling Mork

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

The existence of premiums in futures prices has been the subject of much debate. This debate has centered around two views: the no-arbitrage model or theory of storage, and the equilibrium approach, sometimes called the theory of normal backwardation. The no-arbitrage approach equates the futures price to the spot price, storage cost and convenience yield. One can see immediately that it is difficult at best to apply this approach to electricity markets, where the underlying commodity is non-storable. Storage costs and convenience yield either become infinite or lose their meaning. It is of particular interest, then, to examine these prices from the equilibrium approach, which splits futures prices into an expected spot price component and a risk premium component. (Fama and French, 1987)

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The existence of premiums in futures prices has been the subject of much debate. This debate has centered around two views: the no-arbitrage model or theory of storage, and the equilibrium approach, sometimes called the theory of normal backwardation. The no-arbitrage approach equates the futures price to the spot price, storage cost and convenience yield. One can see immediately that it is difficult at best to apply this approach to electricity markets, where the underlying commodity is non-storable. Storage costs and convenience yield either become infinite or lose their meaning. It is of particular interest, then, to examine these prices from the equilibrium approach, which splits futures prices into an expected spot price component and a risk premium component. (Fama and French, 1987)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The existence of premiums in futures prices has been the subject of much debate. This debate has centered around two views: the no-arbitrage model or theory of storage, and the equilibrium approach, sometimes called the theory of normal backwardation. The no-arbitrage approach equates the futures price to the spot price, storage cost and convenience yield. One can see immediately that it is difficult at best to apply this approach to electricity markets, where the underlying commodity is non-storable. Storage costs and convenience yield either become infinite or lose their meaning. It is of particular interest, then, to examine these prices from the equilibrium approach, which splits futures prices into an expected spot price component and a risk premium component. (Fama and French, 1987)

Key concepts: Normal backwardation, Convenience yield, Futures contract, Spot contract, Arbitrage, Economics, Contango, Yield (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Dynamics of Risk Premiums in Nord Pool's Futures Market — Research Paper | ScholarLens