2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

EXAMINATION OF ROLLOVER CRASH MECHANISMS AND OCCUPANT OUTCOMES

Ana María Eigen

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

This research note addresses the following questions: Which are the most prevalent rollover crash attributes? What is the injury outcome for rollover crash occupants? In this review of National Automotive Sampling System - Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) data over the years 1995 through 2001, rollover crash mechanisms and their related injury patterns are summarized. The tripping mechanism generally inducing rollover was the ground with initial tripping force exerted at the wheels/tires. The trip-over type of rollover was found to be the most prevalent. Most rollovers ended in one or two quarter turns. Slightly more than half of the single vehicle crashes rolled to the left, driver side leading. As the counterpoint, it was noted that the turn-over (untripped) rollover type was the least frequent type of rollover crash. The occupant data were sorted in relation to restraint use and crash configuration. It was noted that among rollover crash occupants, the percentage that were unrestrained was higher than the analogous percentage among planar crashes. Also, unrestrained occupants were at the greatest risk for injury and ejection. Further, MAIS readings for rollover occupants were proportionally higher than those for planar crash occupants. The head and extremities were injured with greatest frequency. It can be concluded that there would have been a larger number of severe injuries were it not for the benefits of safety belt use.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This research note addresses the following questions: Which are the most prevalent rollover crash attributes? What is the injury outcome for rollover crash occupants? In this review of National Automotive Sampling System - Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) data over the years 1995 through 2001, rollover crash mechanisms and their related injury patterns are summarized. The tripping mechanism generally inducing rollover was the ground with initial tripping force exerted at the wheels/tires. The trip-over type of rollover was found to be the most prevalent. Most rollovers ended in one or two quarter turns. Slightly more than half of the single vehicle crashes rolled to the left, driver side leading. As the counterpoint, it was noted that the turn-over (untripped) rollover type was the least frequent type of rollover crash. The occupant data were sorted in relation to restraint use and crash configuration. It was noted that among rollover crash occupants, the percentage that were unrestrained was higher than the analogous percentage among planar crashes. Also, unrestrained occupants were at the greatest risk for injury and ejection. Further, MAIS readings for rollover occupants were proportionally higher than those for planar crash occupants. The head and extremities were injured with greatest frequency. It can be concluded that there would have been a larger number of severe injuries were it not for the benefits of safety belt use.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This research note addresses the following questions: Which are the most prevalent rollover crash attributes? What is the injury outcome for rollover crash occupants? In this review of National Automotive Sampling System - Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) data over the years 1995 through 2001, rollover crash mechanisms and their related injury patterns are summarized. The tripping mechanism generally inducing rollover was the ground with initial tripping force exerted at the wheels/tires. The trip-over type of rollover was found to be the most prevalent. Most rollovers ended in one or two quarter turns. Slightly more than half of the single vehicle crashes rolled to the left, driver side leading. As the counterpoint, it was noted that the turn-over (untripped) rollover type was the least frequent type of rollover crash. The occupant data were sorted in relation to restraint use and crash configuration. It was noted that among rollover crash occupants, the percentage that were unrestrained was higher than the analogous percentage among planar crashes. Also, unrestrained occupants were at the greatest risk for injury and ejection. Further, MAIS readings for rollover occupants were proportionally higher than those for planar crash occupants. The head and extremities were injured with greatest frequency. It can be concluded that there would have been a larger number of severe injuries were it not for the benefits of safety belt use.

Key concepts: Rollover (web design), Crash, Crashworthiness, Crash test, Engineering, Poison control, Forensic engineering, Aeronautics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EXAMINATION OF ROLLOVER CRASH MECHANISMS AND OCCUPANT OUTCOMES — Research Paper | ScholarLens