2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

Sculpture, Photograph, Book: The Sculptures of Picasso (1949)

Patrizia Di Bello

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The photograph highlights how different Picasso&s;s sculpture was from the aesthetics of direct carving, which at the time dominated in Britain, favouring artists who worked &s;directly on the stone&s; such as Henry Moore and Barbara Hepworth. As Alex Potts highlights in his discussion of the twentieth-century sculptural imagination, the idea of modern sculpture as a significant aspect of a modernist aesthetic ‘gathered momentum relatively late, in the 1930s, coming to a head with the spate of publications in the 1950s specifically dedicated to the subject’, yet remained a sideline ‘to the master narratives of modern painting’. This places The Sculptures of Picasso at the beginning of the postwar flowering of a process Brassai had been very much part of, with his involvement with the Surrealist French magazine Minotaure . According to Kahnweiler, many of his paintings were actually of sculptures Picasso did not have the money or the commissions to execute, so he had to paint them instead.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The photograph highlights how different Picasso&s;s sculpture was from the aesthetics of direct carving, which at the time dominated in Britain, favouring artists who worked &s;directly on the stone&s; such as Henry Moore and Barbara Hepworth. As Alex Potts highlights in his discussion of the twentieth-century sculptural imagination, the idea of modern sculpture as a significant aspect of a modernist aesthetic ‘gathered momentum relatively late, in the 1930s, coming to a head with the spate of publications in the 1950s specifically dedicated to the subject’, yet remained a sideline ‘to the master narratives of modern painting’. This places The Sculptures of Picasso at the beginning of the postwar flowering of a process Brassai had been very much part of, with his involvement with the Surrealist French magazine Minotaure . According to Kahnweiler, many of his paintings were actually of sculptures Picasso did not have the money or the commissions to execute, so he had to paint them instead.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The photograph highlights how different Picasso&s;s sculpture was from the aesthetics of direct carving, which at the time dominated in Britain, favouring artists who worked &s;directly on the stone&s; such as Henry Moore and Barbara Hepworth. As Alex Potts highlights in his discussion of the twentieth-century sculptural imagination, the idea of modern sculpture as a significant aspect of a modernist aesthetic ‘gathered momentum relatively late, in the 1930s, coming to a head with the spate of publications in the 1950s specifically dedicated to the subject’, yet remained a sideline ‘to the master narratives of modern painting’. This places The Sculptures of Picasso at the beginning of the postwar flowering of a process Brassai had been very much part of, with his involvement with the Surrealist French magazine Minotaure . According to Kahnweiler, many of his paintings were actually of sculptures Picasso did not have the money or the commissions to execute, so he had to paint them instead.

Key concepts: Sculpture, PICASSO, Art, Visual arts, Art history, Computer graphics (images), Computer science, Painting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sculpture, Photograph, Book: The Sculptures of Picasso (1949) — Research Paper | ScholarLens