2007•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Union competence

Jackie Harrison, Lorna Woods

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Broadcasting policy lies across a number of fault lines within the terrain of the Union relating to its purposes and its powers. Broadcast policymaking has occurred within the developing framework of the Union in which, over time, we have seen expanding Union competence accompanied by changing relationships with member states. This relationship is not just a power struggle between different levels and institutions of government. It also has an impact on the value ascribed to different types of policy areas, depending on whether an area is seen primarily as Union competence, or a field falling mainly within the preserve of the member state. Difficulties also arise out of the different types of competence awarded to the Union itself, which result in tension between these areas of competence, and affect the types of measure that can be taken at Union level. This chapter delineates the nature of the Union as a body of attributed competence, as well as considering its relationship with the constituent member states. It is important to note that this chapter does not consider political or policy processes; rather, it identifies the legal framework within which political and judicial actors operate and the consequent law-based limitations on their respective freedom of action. We commence with a brief introduction to the Union and the principles upon which it operates. We then consider judicial harmonisation, which is the application of treaty freedoms and competition policy, as it limits the scope of member states to regulate in many areas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Broadcasting policy lies across a number of fault lines within the terrain of the Union relating to its purposes and its powers. Broadcast policymaking has occurred within the developing framework of the Union in which, over time, we have seen expanding Union competence accompanied by changing relationships with member states. This relationship is not just a power struggle between different levels and institutions of government. It also has an impact on the value ascribed to different types of policy areas, depending on whether an area is seen primarily as Union competence, or a field falling mainly within the preserve of the member state. Difficulties also arise out of the different types of competence awarded to the Union itself, which result in tension between these areas of competence, and affect the types of measure that can be taken at Union level. This chapter delineates the nature of the Union as a body of attributed competence, as well as considering its relationship with the constituent member states. It is important to note that this chapter does not consider political or policy processes; rather, it identifies the legal framework within which political and judicial actors operate and the consequent law-based limitations on their respective freedom of action. We commence with a brief introduction to the Union and the principles upon which it operates. We then consider judicial harmonisation, which is the application of treaty freedoms and competition policy, as it limits the scope of member states to regulate in many areas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Broadcasting policy lies across a number of fault lines within the terrain of the Union relating to its purposes and its powers. Broadcast policymaking has occurred within the developing framework of the Union in which, over time, we have seen expanding Union competence accompanied by changing relationships with member states. This relationship is not just a power struggle between different levels and institutions of government. It also has an impact on the value ascribed to different types of policy areas, depending on whether an area is seen primarily as Union competence, or a field falling mainly within the preserve of the member state. Difficulties also arise out of the different types of competence awarded to the Union itself, which result in tension between these areas of competence, and affect the types of measure that can be taken at Union level. This chapter delineates the nature of the Union as a body of attributed competence, as well as considering its relationship with the constituent member states. It is important to note that this chapter does not consider political or policy processes; rather, it identifies the legal framework within which political and judicial actors operate and the consequent law-based limitations on their respective freedom of action. We commence with a brief introduction to the Union and the principles upon which it operates. We then consider judicial harmonisation, which is the application of treaty freedoms and competition policy, as it limits the scope of member states to regulate in many areas.

Key concepts: Psychology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Union competence — Research Paper | ScholarLens