2009•UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)Open access

Trends and developments in South African foreign policy : 2009

Yolanda Kemp Spies

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Broadly speaking, foreign policy analysts consider two contexts when studying a \ngiven state’s policy vis-à-vis the international environment: the systemic, which \npertains to the structural determinants of the external domain, and the domestic. \nPredominant attention to the former is associated with realist schools of thought, \nwhich start from the assumption that states, as unitary, rational actors, make and \nimplement foreign policy that is driven by national interests. On the other hand, \nemphasis on the domestic environment is the proclivity of liberal-pluralist foreign \npolicy analysts (and, it should be noted, theorists within the fast evolving new \nparadigm of constructivism, who also contend that ‘foreign policy behaviour is \noften determined primarily by domestic politics’).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Broadly speaking, foreign policy analysts consider two contexts when studying a \ngiven state’s policy vis-à-vis the international environment: the systemic, which \npertains to the structural determinants of the external domain, and the domestic. \nPredominant attention to the former is associated with realist schools of thought, \nwhich start from the assumption that states, as unitary, rational actors, make and \nimplement foreign policy that is driven by national interests. On the other hand, \nemphasis on the domestic environment is the proclivity of liberal-pluralist foreign \npolicy analysts (and, it should be noted, theorists within the fast evolving new \nparadigm of constructivism, who also contend that ‘foreign policy behaviour is \noften determined primarily by domestic politics’).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Broadly speaking, foreign policy analysts consider two contexts when studying a \ngiven state’s policy vis-à-vis the international environment: the systemic, which \npertains to the structural determinants of the external domain, and the domestic. \nPredominant attention to the former is associated with realist schools of thought, \nwhich start from the assumption that states, as unitary, rational actors, make and \nimplement foreign policy that is driven by national interests. On the other hand, \nemphasis on the domestic environment is the proclivity of liberal-pluralist foreign \npolicy analysts (and, it should be noted, theorists within the fast evolving new \nparadigm of constructivism, who also contend that ‘foreign policy behaviour is \noften determined primarily by domestic politics’).

Key concepts: Foreign policy, Foreign policy analysis, Unitary state, Bureaucracy, State (computer science), Political science, Foreign relations, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trends and developments in South African foreign policy : 2009 — Research Paper | ScholarLens