2015•Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnelOpen access

Analysis of Reference re Supreme Court Act: The Implied Currency Requirement for Quebec Seat Appointees to the Supreme Court

D. Plunket Barton

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 6-1 judgment in March 2014, ruled that an appointee toone of the three Quebec seats on the Supreme Court must be either a current Quebec SuperiorCourt judge or a current Quebec lawyer of at least ten years’ standing. Reference re SupremeCourt Act, ss. 5 and 6 [Reference] determined that the phrase “from among” in section 6 of the Supreme Court Act [Act] implies that Supreme Court appointees to the reserved Quebec seats must be current members of one of the designated Quebec legal institutions. The judgment also affi rmed that any change to the composition of the Supreme Court, including the eligibility conditions of appointees, is constitutionally protected. A synthesis of textual, contextual, and purposive analysis is hereinaft er used to review the Reference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 6-1 judgment in March 2014, ruled that an appointee toone of the three Quebec seats on the Supreme Court must be either a current Quebec SuperiorCourt judge or a current Quebec lawyer of at least ten years’ standing. Reference re SupremeCourt Act, ss. 5 and 6 [Reference] determined that the phrase “from among” in section 6 of the Supreme Court Act [Act] implies that Supreme Court appointees to the reserved Quebec seats must be current members of one of the designated Quebec legal institutions. The judgment also affi rmed that any change to the composition of the Supreme Court, including the eligibility conditions of appointees, is constitutionally protected. A synthesis of textual, contextual, and purposive analysis is hereinaft er used to review the Reference.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 6-1 judgment in March 2014, ruled that an appointee toone of the three Quebec seats on the Supreme Court must be either a current Quebec SuperiorCourt judge or a current Quebec lawyer of at least ten years’ standing. Reference re SupremeCourt Act, ss. 5 and 6 [Reference] determined that the phrase “from among” in section 6 of the Supreme Court Act [Act] implies that Supreme Court appointees to the reserved Quebec seats must be current members of one of the designated Quebec legal institutions. The judgment also affi rmed that any change to the composition of the Supreme Court, including the eligibility conditions of appointees, is constitutionally protected. A synthesis of textual, contextual, and purposive analysis is hereinaft er used to review the Reference.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Original jurisdiction, Certiorari, Remand (court procedure), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Reference re Supreme Court Act: The Implied Currency Requirement for Quebec Seat Appointees to the Supreme Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens