1990PubMedRequires access

Differences in activity of minoxidil and cyclosporin A on hair growth in nude and normal mice. Comparisons of in vivo and in vitro studies.

Ann Buhl, D J Waldon, Benjamin F. Miller, M N Brunden

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

Hair growth effects of minoxidil and cyclosporin A were assessed in a series of experiments using nude mice. Systematic monitoring of coat hair showed that untreated nude mice grow extremely sparse and transient hair in cycles. This monitoring was done by photographing each animal through at least one full growth cycle and rating peak growth on a 1 to 4 scale. Topical administration of minoxidil or minoxidil sulfate did not influence this cyclic hair growth. Orally administered minoxidil also had no effect but oral cyclosporin A increased peak hair growth. None of the treatments altered the length of the hair cycle. Direct drug effects on follicles were tested in vitro using organ cultured vibrissae from both nude and normal mice. Minoxidil stimulated hair growth in follicles from normal but not nude mice. In contrast, cyclosporin A stimulated growth only in vibrissae follicles from nude but not normal animals. These studies show that minoxidil and cyclosporin A influence hair growth differentially. Cyclosporin A directly affects nude hair follicles by apparently compensating for a genetic defect inherent in nude follicles. Minoxidil does not have a similar effect. Apparently, the biochemical pathway activated by minoxidil is not a critical defect of hair growth in nude mice. We conclude that nude mice are not useful for studying minoxidil effects but they may be useful in studying pleiotropic effects of the nude gene on hair growth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hair growth effects of minoxidil and cyclosporin A were assessed in a series of experiments using nude mice. Systematic monitoring of coat hair showed that untreated nude mice grow extremely sparse and transient hair in cycles. This monitoring was done by photographing each animal through at least one full growth cycle and rating peak growth on a 1 to 4 scale. Topical administration of minoxidil or minoxidil sulfate did not influence this cyclic hair growth. Orally administered minoxidil also had no effect but oral cyclosporin A increased peak hair growth. None of the treatments altered the length of the hair cycle. Direct drug effects on follicles were tested in vitro using organ cultured vibrissae from both nude and normal mice. Minoxidil stimulated hair growth in follicles from normal but not nude mice. In contrast, cyclosporin A stimulated growth only in vibrissae follicles from nude but not normal animals. These studies show that minoxidil and cyclosporin A influence hair growth differentially. Cyclosporin A directly affects nude hair follicles by apparently compensating for a genetic defect inherent in nude follicles. Minoxidil does not have a similar effect. Apparently, the biochemical pathway activated by minoxidil is not a critical defect of hair growth in nude mice. We conclude that nude mice are not useful for studying minoxidil effects but they may be useful in studying pleiotropic effects of the nude gene on hair growth.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hair growth effects of minoxidil and cyclosporin A were assessed in a series of experiments using nude mice. Systematic monitoring of coat hair showed that untreated nude mice grow extremely sparse and transient hair in cycles. This monitoring was done by photographing each animal through at least one full growth cycle and rating peak growth on a 1 to 4 scale. Topical administration of minoxidil or minoxidil sulfate did not influence this cyclic hair growth. Orally administered minoxidil also had no effect but oral cyclosporin A increased peak hair growth. None of the treatments altered the length of the hair cycle. Direct drug effects on follicles were tested in vitro using organ cultured vibrissae from both nude and normal mice. Minoxidil stimulated hair growth in follicles from normal but not nude mice. In contrast, cyclosporin A stimulated growth only in vibrissae follicles from nude but not normal animals. These studies show that minoxidil and cyclosporin A influence hair growth differentially. Cyclosporin A directly affects nude hair follicles by apparently compensating for a genetic defect inherent in nude follicles. Minoxidil does not have a similar effect. Apparently, the biochemical pathway activated by minoxidil is not a critical defect of hair growth in nude mice. We conclude that nude mice are not useful for studying minoxidil effects but they may be useful in studying pleiotropic effects of the nude gene on hair growth.

Key concepts: Minoxidil, Hair cycle, In vivo, Hair growth, Nude mouse, Endocrinology, Hair loss, Hair follicle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differences in activity of minoxidil and cyclosporin A on hair growth in nude and normal mice. Comparisons of in vivo and in vitro studies. — Research Paper | ScholarLens