2015Ear and HearingOpen access

Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning

Xinyu D. Song, Brittany M. Wallace, Jacob R. Gardner, Noah M. Ledbetter, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Dennis L. Barbour

Open full text 67 citations

Abstract

In Brief Objectives: Pure-tone audiometry has been a staple of hearing assessments for decades. Many different procedures have been proposed for measuring thresholds with pure tones by systematically manipulating intensity one frequency at a time until a discrete threshold function is determined. The authors have developed a novel nonparametric approach for estimating a continuous threshold audiogram using Bayesian estimation and machine learning classification. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of this new method relative to a commonly used threshold measurement technique. Design: The authors performed air conduction pure-tone audiometry on 21 participants between the ages of 18 and 90 years with varying degrees of hearing ability. Two repetitions of automated machine learning audiogram estimation and one repetition of conventional modified Hughson-Westlake ascending–descending audiogram estimation were acquired by an audiologist. The estimated hearing thresholds of these two techniques were compared at standard audiogram frequencies (i.e., 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 kHz). Results: The two threshold estimate methods delivered very similar estimates at standard audiogram frequencies. Specifically, the mean absolute difference between estimates was 4.16 ± 3.76 dB HL. The mean absolute difference between repeated measurements of the new machine learning procedure was 4.51 ± 4.45 dB HL. These values compare favorably with those of other threshold audiogram estimation procedures. Furthermore, the machine learning method generated threshold estimates from significantly fewer samples than the modified Hughson-Westlake procedure while returning a continuous threshold estimate as a function of frequency. Conclusions: The new machine learning audiogram estimation technique produces continuous threshold audiogram estimates accurately, reliably, and efficiently, making it a strong candidate for widespread application in clinical and research audiometry. Pure-tone audiometry has been a standard hearing assessment procedure for decades, but nearly all approaches proposed for measuring the puretone threshold audiogram rely upon discretely estimating thresholds one frequency at a time. This article describes a novel method for audiogram estimation that produces a continuous tone detection audiogram across both frequency and intensity. This automated method uses machine learning classification to estimate the probability of tone detection with significantly fewer samples than the conventional modified Hughson-Westlake procedure. The accuracy and test-retest reliability of this method compares favorable to other audiogram test procedures, making it a promising candidate for application in clinical and research audiometry.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Brief Objectives: Pure-tone audiometry has been a staple of hearing assessments for decades. Many different procedures have been proposed for measuring thresholds with pure tones by systematically manipulating intensity one frequency at a time until a discrete threshold function is determined. The authors have developed a novel nonparametric approach for estimating a continuous threshold audiogram using Bayesian estimation and machine learning classification. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of this new method relative to a commonly used threshold measurement technique. Design: The authors performed air conduction pure-tone audiometry on 21 participants between the ages of 18 and 90 years with varying degrees of hearing ability. Two repetitions of automated machine learning audiogram estimation and one repetition of conventional modified Hughson-Westlake ascending–descending audiogram estimation were acquired by an audiologist. The estimated hearing thresholds of these two techniques were compared at standard audiogram frequencies (i.e., 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 kHz). Results: The two threshold estimate methods delivered very similar estimates at standard audiogram frequencies. Specifically, the mean absolute difference between estimates was 4.16 ± 3.76 dB HL. The mean absolute difference between repeated measurements of the new machine learning procedure was 4.51 ± 4.45 dB HL. These values compare favorably with those of other threshold audiogram estimation procedures. Furthermore, the machine learning method generated threshold estimates from significantly fewer samples than the modified Hughson-Westlake procedure while returning a continuous threshold estimate as a function of frequency. Conclusions: The new machine learning audiogram estimation technique produces continuous threshold audiogram estimates accurately, reliably, and efficiently, making it a strong candidate for widespread application in clinical and research audiometry. Pure-tone audiometry has been a standard hearing assessment procedure for decades, but nearly all approaches proposed for measuring the puretone threshold audiogram rely upon discretely estimating thresholds one frequency at a time. This article describes a novel method for audiogram estimation that produces a continuous tone detection audiogram across both frequency and intensity. This automated method uses machine learning classification to estimate the probability of tone detection with significantly fewer samples than the conventional modified Hughson-Westlake procedure. The accuracy and test-retest reliability of this method compares favorable to other audiogram test procedures, making it a promising candidate for application in clinical and research audiometry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 67 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Brief Objectives: Pure-tone audiometry has been a staple of hearing assessments for decades. Many different procedures have been proposed for measuring thresholds with pure tones by systematically manipulating intensity one frequency at a time until a discrete threshold function is determined. The authors have developed a novel nonparametric approach for estimating a continuous threshold audiogram using Bayesian estimation and machine learning classification. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of this new method relative to a commonly used threshold measurement technique. Design: The authors performed air conduction pure-tone audiometry on 21 participants between the ages of 18 and 90 years with varying degrees of hearing ability. Two repetitions of automated machine learning audiogram estimation and one repetition of conventional modified Hughson-Westlake ascending–descending audiogram estimation were acquired by an audiologist. The estimated hearing thresholds of these two techniques were compared at standard audiogram frequencies (i.e., 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 kHz). Results: The two threshold estimate methods delivered very similar estimates at standard audiogram frequencies. Specifically, the mean absolute difference between estimates was 4.16 ± 3.76 dB HL. The mean absolute difference between repeated measurements of the new machine learning procedure was 4.51 ± 4.45 dB HL. These values compare favorably with those of other threshold audiogram estimation procedures. Furthermore, the machine learning method generated threshold estimates from significantly fewer samples than the modified Hughson-Westlake procedure while returning a continuous threshold estimate as a function of frequency. Conclusions: The new machine learning audiogram estimation technique produces continuous threshold audiogram estimates accurately, reliably, and efficiently, making it a strong candidate for widespread application in clinical and research audiometry. Pure-tone audiometry has been a standard hearing assessment procedure for decades, but nearly all approaches proposed for measuring the puretone threshold audiogram rely upon discretely estimating thresholds one frequency at a time. This article describes a novel method for audiogram estimation that produces a continuous tone detection audiogram across both frequency and intensity. This automated method uses machine learning classification to estimate the probability of tone detection with significantly fewer samples than the conventional modified Hughson-Westlake procedure. The accuracy and test-retest reliability of this method compares favorable to other audiogram test procedures, making it a promising candidate for application in clinical and research audiometry.

Key concepts: Audiogram, Audiometry, Absolute threshold of hearing, Percentile, Audiology, Standard deviation, Statistics, Audiometer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning — Research Paper | ScholarLens