2009EGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsRequires access

Burial, and consequences to magnetostratigraphy

C. Aubourg, J. P. Pozzi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

3 to 5 km depth) point for the formation of pyrrhotite and magnetite in claystones. These experimental results are well supported by growing number of observation of pyrrhotite and magnetite in >2km-depth sedimentary rocks from various geological settings. We suggest therefore that the formation of pyrrhotite and magnetite is a common process during burial, and can lead to subsequent magnetic overprints. We propose a model of magnetic grains formation during burial with the continuous record of the magnetic earth field. Assuming that new magnetic grains overprinted the primary magnetization, our model shows that during burial, it is possible to have the record of reverse and normal polarity chrons, similar to those carried by a primary magnetization. Correlating these chrons to a standard magnetostratigraphy chart for dating rocks may be pointless if the magnetic overprint overwhelmed the primary magnetization. To prevent from a false interpretation of magnetostratigraphy, we will propose some tests, based on low-temperature (10K-300K) investigation of saturated isothermal remanent magnetization or high-temperature (20°C-600°C) demagnetization of natural remanent magnetization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

3 to 5 km depth) point for the formation of pyrrhotite and magnetite in claystones. These experimental results are well supported by growing number of observation of pyrrhotite and magnetite in >2km-depth sedimentary rocks from various geological settings. We suggest therefore that the formation of pyrrhotite and magnetite is a common process during burial, and can lead to subsequent magnetic overprints. We propose a model of magnetic grains formation during burial with the continuous record of the magnetic earth field. Assuming that new magnetic grains overprinted the primary magnetization, our model shows that during burial, it is possible to have the record of reverse and normal polarity chrons, similar to those carried by a primary magnetization. Correlating these chrons to a standard magnetostratigraphy chart for dating rocks may be pointless if the magnetic overprint overwhelmed the primary magnetization. To prevent from a false interpretation of magnetostratigraphy, we will propose some tests, based on low-temperature (10K-300K) investigation of saturated isothermal remanent magnetization or high-temperature (20°C-600°C) demagnetization of natural remanent magnetization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

3 to 5 km depth) point for the formation of pyrrhotite and magnetite in claystones. These experimental results are well supported by growing number of observation of pyrrhotite and magnetite in >2km-depth sedimentary rocks from various geological settings. We suggest therefore that the formation of pyrrhotite and magnetite is a common process during burial, and can lead to subsequent magnetic overprints. We propose a model of magnetic grains formation during burial with the continuous record of the magnetic earth field. Assuming that new magnetic grains overprinted the primary magnetization, our model shows that during burial, it is possible to have the record of reverse and normal polarity chrons, similar to those carried by a primary magnetization. Correlating these chrons to a standard magnetostratigraphy chart for dating rocks may be pointless if the magnetic overprint overwhelmed the primary magnetization. To prevent from a false interpretation of magnetostratigraphy, we will propose some tests, based on low-temperature (10K-300K) investigation of saturated isothermal remanent magnetization or high-temperature (20°C-600°C) demagnetization of natural remanent magnetization.

Key concepts: Magnetostratigraphy, Pyrrhotite, Geology, Remanence, Natural remanent magnetization, Magnetite, Magnetization, Rock magnetism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Burial, and consequences to magnetostratigraphy — Research Paper | ScholarLens