1981OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Where chemical EOR stands today

Wayne R. Hause

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Two major factors that stand in the way of chemical recovery of residual oil left in a reservoir after waterflooding are the high cost of efficient processes and reservoir heterogeneity. Under present economic conditions, it appears that chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes are only marginally profitable when applied under true tertiary conditions. These same processes can be more profitable - and more efficient - if initiated earlier in the life of a reservoir when oil saturations are higher. Experience shows EOR processes to be more sensitive to reservoir heterogeneities than conventional waterflooding. Field tests of various chemical processes demonstrate their ability to recover substantial amounts of oil from reservoirs that had been previously waterflooded to their economic limit.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two major factors that stand in the way of chemical recovery of residual oil left in a reservoir after waterflooding are the high cost of efficient processes and reservoir heterogeneity. Under present economic conditions, it appears that chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes are only marginally profitable when applied under true tertiary conditions. These same processes can be more profitable - and more efficient - if initiated earlier in the life of a reservoir when oil saturations are higher. Experience shows EOR processes to be more sensitive to reservoir heterogeneities than conventional waterflooding. Field tests of various chemical processes demonstrate their ability to recover substantial amounts of oil from reservoirs that had been previously waterflooded to their economic limit.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two major factors that stand in the way of chemical recovery of residual oil left in a reservoir after waterflooding are the high cost of efficient processes and reservoir heterogeneity. Under present economic conditions, it appears that chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes are only marginally profitable when applied under true tertiary conditions. These same processes can be more profitable - and more efficient - if initiated earlier in the life of a reservoir when oil saturations are higher. Experience shows EOR processes to be more sensitive to reservoir heterogeneities than conventional waterflooding. Field tests of various chemical processes demonstrate their ability to recover substantial amounts of oil from reservoirs that had been previously waterflooded to their economic limit.

Key concepts: Residual oil, Petroleum engineering, Enhanced oil recovery, Petroleum reservoir, Oil field, Environmental science, Well stimulation, Reservoir engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Where chemical EOR stands today — Research Paper | ScholarLens