2001Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

A Failure in Strategy: America and the Vietnam War 1965-1968

James M. Bright

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The U.S. strategy pursued in Vietnam between 1965-1968 to contain Communism above the 17th parallel was flawed. This paper analyzes the primary factors in President Johnson's decision to expand U.S. involvement in Vietnam with the introduction of ground forces. Second, this paper provides an analysis of U.S. military strategy and identifies its strategic weaknesses. Lastly, an alternative U.S. grand strategy, in concurrence with Bruce Palmer's, The 25-year War: America's Military Role in Vietnam, will be proposed. This strategy, if implemented, would have galvanized the people behind the U.S. strategy in Vietnam. It would have given the military Commanders in Vietnam the flexibility required to execute a military strategy capable of defeating not only the communist forces of North Vietnam but also the pacification of South Vietnam.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.S. strategy pursued in Vietnam between 1965-1968 to contain Communism above the 17th parallel was flawed. This paper analyzes the primary factors in President Johnson's decision to expand U.S. involvement in Vietnam with the introduction of ground forces. Second, this paper provides an analysis of U.S. military strategy and identifies its strategic weaknesses. Lastly, an alternative U.S. grand strategy, in concurrence with Bruce Palmer's, The 25-year War: America's Military Role in Vietnam, will be proposed. This strategy, if implemented, would have galvanized the people behind the U.S. strategy in Vietnam. It would have given the military Commanders in Vietnam the flexibility required to execute a military strategy capable of defeating not only the communist forces of North Vietnam but also the pacification of South Vietnam.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.S. strategy pursued in Vietnam between 1965-1968 to contain Communism above the 17th parallel was flawed. This paper analyzes the primary factors in President Johnson's decision to expand U.S. involvement in Vietnam with the introduction of ground forces. Second, this paper provides an analysis of U.S. military strategy and identifies its strategic weaknesses. Lastly, an alternative U.S. grand strategy, in concurrence with Bruce Palmer's, The 25-year War: America's Military Role in Vietnam, will be proposed. This strategy, if implemented, would have galvanized the people behind the U.S. strategy in Vietnam. It would have given the military Commanders in Vietnam the flexibility required to execute a military strategy capable of defeating not only the communist forces of North Vietnam but also the pacification of South Vietnam.

Key concepts: Vietnam War, Communism, Political science, Military strategy, Flexibility (engineering), Strengths and weaknesses, Political economy, Economic history

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Failure in Strategy: America and the Vietnam War 1965-1968 — Research Paper | ScholarLens