2007•PubMed CentralOpen access

P47-M Comparison of Pyrosequencing and Fluorescent Dideoxynucleotide Sequencing for Measurement of CpG Methylation

Karl M. Hager

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In mammals, cytosine methylation at CpG sites is an important epigenetic mechanism for altering gene expression in normal and cancer cells. Sequencing of PCR products from bisulfite-treated genomic DNA provides the most direct measurement of methylation at individual cytosines. To compare the relative ability of pyrosequencing and fluorescent dideoxynucleotide sequencing to accurately quantify cytosine methylation, I designed primers for amplification of a 197-bp region within the IGF2 gene. Two sets of primers were synthesized: (1) a set containing a 5′-biotin on the reverse primer (used for streptavidin purification of the template strand prior to pyrosequencing) and (2) a set containing the M13 forward and M13 reverse primer sequences as 5′ extensions of the forward and reverse PCR primers, respectively. Only the first set was used to generate PCR products for pyrosequencing; both sets were used to make amplicons for fluorescent DNA sequencing. Following PCR amplification of eight bisulfite-treated human genomic DNAs, templates were purified and subjected to both DNA sequencing technologies. Pyrosequencing was able to measure percent methylation at 7 CpG sites, while the fluorescent chemistry was able to interrogate up to 12 sites, due in part to its longer read length. The percent methylation measured by each technology differed for a given CpG site and genomic DNA: the value obtained by pyrosequencing was usually 10–15% less than that obtained by the fluorescent chemistry. In order to determine which chemistry measures percent methylation more accurately, experiments with known ratios of fully methylated and unmethylated templates are underway.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In mammals, cytosine methylation at CpG sites is an important epigenetic mechanism for altering gene expression in normal and cancer cells. Sequencing of PCR products from bisulfite-treated genomic DNA provides the most direct measurement of methylation at individual cytosines. To compare the relative ability of pyrosequencing and fluorescent dideoxynucleotide sequencing to accurately quantify cytosine methylation, I designed primers for amplification of a 197-bp region within the IGF2 gene. Two sets of primers were synthesized: (1) a set containing a 5′-biotin on the reverse primer (used for streptavidin purification of the template strand prior to pyrosequencing) and (2) a set containing the M13 forward and M13 reverse primer sequences as 5′ extensions of the forward and reverse PCR primers, respectively. Only the first set was used to generate PCR products for pyrosequencing; both sets were used to make amplicons for fluorescent DNA sequencing. Following PCR amplification of eight bisulfite-treated human genomic DNAs, templates were purified and subjected to both DNA sequencing technologies. Pyrosequencing was able to measure percent methylation at 7 CpG sites, while the fluorescent chemistry was able to interrogate up to 12 sites, due in part to its longer read length. The percent methylation measured by each technology differed for a given CpG site and genomic DNA: the value obtained by pyrosequencing was usually 10–15% less than that obtained by the fluorescent chemistry. In order to determine which chemistry measures percent methylation more accurately, experiments with known ratios of fully methylated and unmethylated templates are underway.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In mammals, cytosine methylation at CpG sites is an important epigenetic mechanism for altering gene expression in normal and cancer cells. Sequencing of PCR products from bisulfite-treated genomic DNA provides the most direct measurement of methylation at individual cytosines. To compare the relative ability of pyrosequencing and fluorescent dideoxynucleotide sequencing to accurately quantify cytosine methylation, I designed primers for amplification of a 197-bp region within the IGF2 gene. Two sets of primers were synthesized: (1) a set containing a 5′-biotin on the reverse primer (used for streptavidin purification of the template strand prior to pyrosequencing) and (2) a set containing the M13 forward and M13 reverse primer sequences as 5′ extensions of the forward and reverse PCR primers, respectively. Only the first set was used to generate PCR products for pyrosequencing; both sets were used to make amplicons for fluorescent DNA sequencing. Following PCR amplification of eight bisulfite-treated human genomic DNAs, templates were purified and subjected to both DNA sequencing technologies. Pyrosequencing was able to measure percent methylation at 7 CpG sites, while the fluorescent chemistry was able to interrogate up to 12 sites, due in part to its longer read length. The percent methylation measured by each technology differed for a given CpG site and genomic DNA: the value obtained by pyrosequencing was usually 10–15% less than that obtained by the fluorescent chemistry. In order to determine which chemistry measures percent methylation more accurately, experiments with known ratios of fully methylated and unmethylated templates are underway.

Key concepts: Pyrosequencing, Illumina Methylation Assay, Bisulfite sequencing, Bisulfite, Amplicon, CpG site, DNA methylation, Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P47-M Comparison of Pyrosequencing and Fluorescent Dideoxynucleotide Sequencing for Measurement of CpG Methylation — Research Paper | ScholarLens