1995PubMedRequires access

Late versus early repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Clinical and biomechanical evaluation.

E. M. Boyden, Harold B. Kitaoka, Tom D. Cahalan, Kai‐Nan An

Open publisher page 110 citations

Abstract

Eleven patients who had late reconstruction for Achilles tendon rupture were compared with 10 patients who had immediate repair. The followup period averaged 8 years for both groups. Results, based on a clinical score, were successful (excellent or good) for all but 1 patient. Although manual testing demonstrated normal plantar flexion strength in all but 1 patient, significant differences were seen in isometric and isokinetic plantar flexion strength of the involved sides as compared with the uninvolved sides of these patients. The patient with the unsuccessful result had abnormalities in vertical, foreaft, and medial-lateral force components of the ground reaction force. Three-dimensional motion analysis showed decreased total motion in the sagittal plane on the operated side as compared with the unoperated side in this patient. The data indicated that patients with late reconstruction of Achilles tendon rupture have successful clinical results comparable with those of early repair.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Eleven patients who had late reconstruction for Achilles tendon rupture were compared with 10 patients who had immediate repair. The followup period averaged 8 years for both groups. Results, based on a clinical score, were successful (excellent or good) for all but 1 patient. Although manual testing demonstrated normal plantar flexion strength in all but 1 patient, significant differences were seen in isometric and isokinetic plantar flexion strength of the involved sides as compared with the uninvolved sides of these patients. The patient with the unsuccessful result had abnormalities in vertical, foreaft, and medial-lateral force components of the ground reaction force. Three-dimensional motion analysis showed decreased total motion in the sagittal plane on the operated side as compared with the unoperated side in this patient. The data indicated that patients with late reconstruction of Achilles tendon rupture have successful clinical results comparable with those of early repair.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 110 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Eleven patients who had late reconstruction for Achilles tendon rupture were compared with 10 patients who had immediate repair. The followup period averaged 8 years for both groups. Results, based on a clinical score, were successful (excellent or good) for all but 1 patient. Although manual testing demonstrated normal plantar flexion strength in all but 1 patient, significant differences were seen in isometric and isokinetic plantar flexion strength of the involved sides as compared with the uninvolved sides of these patients. The patient with the unsuccessful result had abnormalities in vertical, foreaft, and medial-lateral force components of the ground reaction force. Three-dimensional motion analysis showed decreased total motion in the sagittal plane on the operated side as compared with the unoperated side in this patient. The data indicated that patients with late reconstruction of Achilles tendon rupture have successful clinical results comparable with those of early repair.

Key concepts: Medicine, Achilles tendon, Sagittal plane, Achilles tendon rupture, Isometric exercise, Plantar flexion, Surgery, Tendon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Late versus early repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Clinical and biomechanical evaluation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens