Validation and Reliability of Blood Pressure Monitors
Eoin OʼBrien, Neil Atkins
Abstract
Eoin OʼBrien, Neil Atkins
Abstract
With the increasing marketing of automated and semiautomated devices for the measurement of blood pressure, there is a need for potential purchasers to be able to satisfy themselves that such devices have been evaluated according to agreed-upon criteria (1). With this need in mind, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) published a standard for electronic or aneroid sphygmomanometers in 1987 (2), which included a protocol for the evaluation of the accuracy of devices; this was followed in 1990 by the protocol of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) (3). Both protocols were revised in 1993 (4,5). These protocols, which differed in detail, had a common objective, namely the standardization of validation procedures to establish minimum standards of accuracy and performance and to facilitate comparison of one device with another (6).
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With the increasing marketing of automated and semiautomated devices for the measurement of blood pressure, there is a need for potential purchasers to be able to satisfy themselves that such devices have been evaluated according to agreed-upon criteria (1). With this need in mind, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) published a standard for electronic or aneroid sphygmomanometers in 1987 (2), which included a protocol for the evaluation of the accuracy of devices; this was followed in 1990 by the protocol of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) (3). Both protocols were revised in 1993 (4,5). These protocols, which differed in detail, had a common objective, namely the standardization of validation procedures to establish minimum standards of accuracy and performance and to facilitate comparison of one device with another (6).
Key concepts: Medical instrumentation, Sphygmomanometer, Standardization, Reliability (semiconductor), Protocol (science), Reliability engineering, Blood pressure, Computer science