Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court?
Robert P. Greenspoon
Abstract
Open-access reader
Robert P. Greenspoon
Abstract
Open-access reader
In the past few years, legislative proposals for United States patent reform have centered on changing the Patent Act. 1 Some commentators have questioned patent reform, asking whether such proposals favor large interests at the expense of individuals and small businesses. 2 Overlooked since 1992 in discussions about patent reform is an obscure proposal that ought to help individuals, small businesses, large businesses, consumers, and the court system itself-a Patent Small Claims Court.In the early 1990s, several important policy groups, including the American Bar Association ("ABA") and the American Intellectual Property Law Association ("AIPLA"), voiced support for such a court, but, ultimately, no one took up the cause.3 At the time, these policy groups expressed concerns that transaction costs for patent enforcement under the current U.S. system are prohibitively high for a significant subset of inventors-namely, those who stand to recover only small sums from any given infringer.4 In this article, I re-propose (with improvements) a Patent Small Claims Court for the United States.Time has shown that such a court will credibly address a major failure in the current patent system-its
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the past few years, legislative proposals for United States patent reform have centered on changing the Patent Act. 1 Some commentators have questioned patent reform, asking whether such proposals favor large interests at the expense of individuals and small businesses. 2 Overlooked since 1992 in discussions about patent reform is an obscure proposal that ought to help individuals, small businesses, large businesses, consumers, and the court system itself-a Patent Small Claims Court.In the early 1990s, several important policy groups, including the American Bar Association ("ABA") and the American Intellectual Property Law Association ("AIPLA"), voiced support for such a court, but, ultimately, no one took up the cause.3 At the time, these policy groups expressed concerns that transaction costs for patent enforcement under the current U.S. system are prohibitively high for a significant subset of inventors-namely, those who stand to recover only small sums from any given infringer.4 In this article, I re-propose (with improvements) a Patent Small Claims Court for the United States.Time has shown that such a court will credibly address a major failure in the current patent system-its
Key concepts: Enforcement, Patent troll, Intellectual property, Legislature, Database transaction, Law, Business, Law and economics