1993•PubMedRequires access

Endometrial ablation. A report of four cases.

R.J. Gimpelson, R.D. Lentz

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Three women had evidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia at the time of endometrial ablation, discovered because they had mechanical preparation of the endometrium rather than medical preparation. In one of these patients, a frozen section revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and the ablation was cancelled. A fourth woman had an unsuccessful endometrial ablation; repeat ablation was followed by nine months of amenorrhea, at which time she began spotting and requested a hysterectomy. The pathology report on the hysterectomy specimen revealed adenomatous hyperplasia. Gynecologists must be vigilant in their evaluation of the endometrium before, during and after endometrial ablation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three women had evidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia at the time of endometrial ablation, discovered because they had mechanical preparation of the endometrium rather than medical preparation. In one of these patients, a frozen section revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and the ablation was cancelled. A fourth woman had an unsuccessful endometrial ablation; repeat ablation was followed by nine months of amenorrhea, at which time she began spotting and requested a hysterectomy. The pathology report on the hysterectomy specimen revealed adenomatous hyperplasia. Gynecologists must be vigilant in their evaluation of the endometrium before, during and after endometrial ablation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three women had evidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia at the time of endometrial ablation, discovered because they had mechanical preparation of the endometrium rather than medical preparation. In one of these patients, a frozen section revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and the ablation was cancelled. A fourth woman had an unsuccessful endometrial ablation; repeat ablation was followed by nine months of amenorrhea, at which time she began spotting and requested a hysterectomy. The pathology report on the hysterectomy specimen revealed adenomatous hyperplasia. Gynecologists must be vigilant in their evaluation of the endometrium before, during and after endometrial ablation.

Key concepts: Endometrial ablation, Medicine, Endometrium, Hysterectomy, Endometrial hyperplasia, Ablation, Amenorrhea, Hyperplasia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endometrial ablation. A report of four cases. — Research Paper | ScholarLens