JUDICIAL REVIEW OF TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT.
George Cameron Coggins, Thomas O. McGarity
Abstract
George Cameron Coggins, Thomas O. McGarity
Abstract
A discussion covers the provisions of the 1972 Clean Water Act and the 1977 Amendments; the implementation of the Clean Water Act; the judicial role in the standard-setting process; the guidelines courts purport to use in assessing the legality of EPA action; a judicial review of EPA Water pollution technological standards; some litigations decided to date (e.g., API vs. EPA; Marathon Oil Co. vs. EPA); and the effect of the 1977 Amendments on the judicial function or review results.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A discussion covers the provisions of the 1972 Clean Water Act and the 1977 Amendments; the implementation of the Clean Water Act; the judicial role in the standard-setting process; the guidelines courts purport to use in assessing the legality of EPA action; a judicial review of EPA Water pollution technological standards; some litigations decided to date (e.g., API vs. EPA; Marathon Oil Co. vs. EPA); and the effect of the 1977 Amendments on the judicial function or review results.
Key concepts: Principle of legality, Judicial review, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Clean water, Law, Political science, Business