Comparison of topical glyceryl trinitrate with diltiazem ointment for treatment of chronic anal fissure. A randomized clinical trial.
Behnam Sanei, Mohsen Mahmoodieh, Hassan Masoudpour
Abstract
Behnam Sanei, Mohsen Mahmoodieh, Hassan Masoudpour
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical glycerol trinitrate ointment (GTN) with topical diltiazem hydrochloride ointment (DTZ) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. METHOD: Prospectively, 102 patients were treated randomly with either GTN ointment (0.2%) or DTZ ointment (2%) couple of times daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (88.2%) in group DTZ and 36 patients (70.6%) in group GTZ had reduction of symptoms. The decrease in the symptoms for group DTZ were significantly more than that for group GTN (P = 0.02). Mean time of symptom reduction was 2.44 +/- 0.30 in group DTZ and 2.50 +/- 0.28 weeks in group GTN without significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05). Complete relieving of symptoms was observed in 72.5%, 54.9% patients in groups DTZ and GTN, respectively. The frequency of complete relieving of symptoms between two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Complete remission of anal fissure was occurred in 66.7% patients in group DTZ and 54.9% patients in group GTN, which was no different, significantly. Mean time taken for fissure healing in GTN group was dramatically less than DTZ group (P = 0.001). Finally, 33.3% of patients in DTZ group and 45.1% of patients in GTN group was operated. The need for operation was not significant between two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both DTZ and GTN are equally effective and can be the preferred first-line treatment of chronic anal fissure a. However, GTN is associated with a higher rate of headache, and it should be replaced by DTZ.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical glycerol trinitrate ointment (GTN) with topical diltiazem hydrochloride ointment (DTZ) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. METHOD: Prospectively, 102 patients were treated randomly with either GTN ointment (0.2%) or DTZ ointment (2%) couple of times daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (88.2%) in group DTZ and 36 patients (70.6%) in group GTZ had reduction of symptoms. The decrease in the symptoms for group DTZ were significantly more than that for group GTN (P = 0.02). Mean time of symptom reduction was 2.44 +/- 0.30 in group DTZ and 2.50 +/- 0.28 weeks in group GTN without significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05). Complete relieving of symptoms was observed in 72.5%, 54.9% patients in groups DTZ and GTN, respectively. The frequency of complete relieving of symptoms between two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Complete remission of anal fissure was occurred in 66.7% patients in group DTZ and 54.9% patients in group GTN, which was no different, significantly. Mean time taken for fissure healing in GTN group was dramatically less than DTZ group (P = 0.001). Finally, 33.3% of patients in DTZ group and 45.1% of patients in GTN group was operated. The need for operation was not significant between two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both DTZ and GTN are equally effective and can be the preferred first-line treatment of chronic anal fissure a. However, GTN is associated with a higher rate of headache, and it should be replaced by DTZ.
Key concepts: Medicine, Anal fissure, Diltiazem, Diltiazem hydrochloride, Randomized controlled trial, Anesthesia, Surgery, Internal medicine