1988PubMedRequires access

Randomized double blind trial comparing sotalol and propranolol in chronic ventricular arrhythmia.

George Kubac, W. Peter Klinke, Megan S. Grace

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Sotalol is a beta-blocker which also prolongs repolarization. Its relative efficacy towards suppressing chronic ventricular arrhythmia was tested by comparison with propranolol. This double blind parallel comparison study involved 30 patients with or without coronary artery disease who had chronic symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and more than an average of 30 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per hour. After the placebo baseline period patients received four weeks of active treatment with sotalol or propranolol. Responders were patients who had 75% or more reduction of PVCs during 24 h Holter monitoring. One patient in each treatment group had intolerable side effects on a low dose of the drug and were withdrawn. Side effects were present more frequently in the propranolol group compared with sotalol. Proarrhythmic effects were present in one patient on sotalol. There was no significant difference in suppression of ventricular extrasystoles (sotalol 65%, propranolol 44%), with reduction in ventricular couplets being 99% for sotalol and 49% for propranolol. There was a significant increase in QTc in patients on sotalol. Therefore, sotalol is a well tolerated drug and may be preferable to propranolol for control of chronic ventricular arrhythmia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sotalol is a beta-blocker which also prolongs repolarization. Its relative efficacy towards suppressing chronic ventricular arrhythmia was tested by comparison with propranolol. This double blind parallel comparison study involved 30 patients with or without coronary artery disease who had chronic symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and more than an average of 30 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per hour. After the placebo baseline period patients received four weeks of active treatment with sotalol or propranolol. Responders were patients who had 75% or more reduction of PVCs during 24 h Holter monitoring. One patient in each treatment group had intolerable side effects on a low dose of the drug and were withdrawn. Side effects were present more frequently in the propranolol group compared with sotalol. Proarrhythmic effects were present in one patient on sotalol. There was no significant difference in suppression of ventricular extrasystoles (sotalol 65%, propranolol 44%), with reduction in ventricular couplets being 99% for sotalol and 49% for propranolol. There was a significant increase in QTc in patients on sotalol. Therefore, sotalol is a well tolerated drug and may be preferable to propranolol for control of chronic ventricular arrhythmia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sotalol is a beta-blocker which also prolongs repolarization. Its relative efficacy towards suppressing chronic ventricular arrhythmia was tested by comparison with propranolol. This double blind parallel comparison study involved 30 patients with or without coronary artery disease who had chronic symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and more than an average of 30 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per hour. After the placebo baseline period patients received four weeks of active treatment with sotalol or propranolol. Responders were patients who had 75% or more reduction of PVCs during 24 h Holter monitoring. One patient in each treatment group had intolerable side effects on a low dose of the drug and were withdrawn. Side effects were present more frequently in the propranolol group compared with sotalol. Proarrhythmic effects were present in one patient on sotalol. There was no significant difference in suppression of ventricular extrasystoles (sotalol 65%, propranolol 44%), with reduction in ventricular couplets being 99% for sotalol and 49% for propranolol. There was a significant increase in QTc in patients on sotalol. Therefore, sotalol is a well tolerated drug and may be preferable to propranolol for control of chronic ventricular arrhythmia.

Key concepts: Sotalol, Medicine, Propranolol, Cardiology, Placebo, Internal medicine, QT interval, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Randomized double blind trial comparing sotalol and propranolol in chronic ventricular arrhythmia. — Research Paper | ScholarLens