1990PsychobiologyOpen access

US-US conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response: Emergence of a conditioned response without alpha conditioning

Bernard G. Schreurs, Daniel L. Alkon

Open full text 61 citations

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response (NMR) could be obtained when paraorbital electrical stimulation served as both the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US). In Experiment 1, a range of stimulation intensities (0.1, 0.25, 0.5,1, and 2 mA) and durations (10, 25, 50, and 100 msec) were presented in order to detail the frequency, latency, amplitude, and duration of unconditioned responses (URs) to the paraorbital US. On the basis of the response characteristics obtained in Experiment 1, a set of stimulation values was adopted in Experiment 2 to (1) examine whether classical conditioning could be obtained when paraorbital electrical stimulation served as both the CS and the US, and (2) determine whether conditioning was related to the intensity of the CS. The data from Experiment 1 indicated that response frequency, amplitude, duration, latency, and peak latency were a function of stimulus intensity and duration. The results of Experiment 2 revealed significant levels of conditioned responding that emerged as a function of CS-US pairings. There were no systematic changes in the UR to the CS as a function of CS-US pairings. Moreover, the levels of conditioning obtained using a paraorbital CS were a function of CS intensity. The results are discussed in terms of the relevance of US-US conditioning studies to contemporary theories of associative learning and the search for the neural substrates of learning and memory.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response (NMR) could be obtained when paraorbital electrical stimulation served as both the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US). In Experiment 1, a range of stimulation intensities (0.1, 0.25, 0.5,1, and 2 mA) and durations (10, 25, 50, and 100 msec) were presented in order to detail the frequency, latency, amplitude, and duration of unconditioned responses (URs) to the paraorbital US. On the basis of the response characteristics obtained in Experiment 1, a set of stimulation values was adopted in Experiment 2 to (1) examine whether classical conditioning could be obtained when paraorbital electrical stimulation served as both the CS and the US, and (2) determine whether conditioning was related to the intensity of the CS. The data from Experiment 1 indicated that response frequency, amplitude, duration, latency, and peak latency were a function of stimulus intensity and duration. The results of Experiment 2 revealed significant levels of conditioned responding that emerged as a function of CS-US pairings. There were no systematic changes in the UR to the CS as a function of CS-US pairings. Moreover, the levels of conditioning obtained using a paraorbital CS were a function of CS intensity. The results are discussed in terms of the relevance of US-US conditioning studies to contemporary theories of associative learning and the search for the neural substrates of learning and memory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 61 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response (NMR) could be obtained when paraorbital electrical stimulation served as both the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US). In Experiment 1, a range of stimulation intensities (0.1, 0.25, 0.5,1, and 2 mA) and durations (10, 25, 50, and 100 msec) were presented in order to detail the frequency, latency, amplitude, and duration of unconditioned responses (URs) to the paraorbital US. On the basis of the response characteristics obtained in Experiment 1, a set of stimulation values was adopted in Experiment 2 to (1) examine whether classical conditioning could be obtained when paraorbital electrical stimulation served as both the CS and the US, and (2) determine whether conditioning was related to the intensity of the CS. The data from Experiment 1 indicated that response frequency, amplitude, duration, latency, and peak latency were a function of stimulus intensity and duration. The results of Experiment 2 revealed significant levels of conditioned responding that emerged as a function of CS-US pairings. There were no systematic changes in the UR to the CS as a function of CS-US pairings. Moreover, the levels of conditioning obtained using a paraorbital CS were a function of CS intensity. The results are discussed in terms of the relevance of US-US conditioning studies to contemporary theories of associative learning and the search for the neural substrates of learning and memory.

Key concepts: Nictitating membrane, Conditioning, Classical conditioning, Measures of conditioned emotional response, Unconditioned stimulus, Psychology, Stimulation, Stimulus (psychology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
US-US conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response: Emergence of a conditioned response without alpha conditioning — Research Paper | ScholarLens