1979University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)Open access

Relative consistency of ENDF/B-IV and -V with fast-reactor benchmarks

Y. Yeivin, J. J. Wagschal, J.H. Marable, C.R. Weisbin

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

The consistency of eleven selected fast-reactor and two neutron-field integral experiments with the ENDF/B-IV and -V libraries was examined by considering contributions to chi-square. Integral measurements least consistent with each given library were identified one at a time, and the particular cross sections which were significantly adjusted at each step were also identified. The results of this analysis demonstrate that, with respect to twelve out of the thirteen integral measurements considered, ENDF/B-V is a marked improvement over Version IV in the sense that (a) the integral data are significantly more consistent with Version V than with Version IV, (b) fewer cross sections need to be adjusted to achieve agreement between all the experimental data and the corresponding values calculated by Version V, and (c) the necessary adjustments are smaller.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The consistency of eleven selected fast-reactor and two neutron-field integral experiments with the ENDF/B-IV and -V libraries was examined by considering contributions to chi-square. Integral measurements least consistent with each given library were identified one at a time, and the particular cross sections which were significantly adjusted at each step were also identified. The results of this analysis demonstrate that, with respect to twelve out of the thirteen integral measurements considered, ENDF/B-V is a marked improvement over Version IV in the sense that (a) the integral data are significantly more consistent with Version V than with Version IV, (b) fewer cross sections need to be adjusted to achieve agreement between all the experimental data and the corresponding values calculated by Version V, and (c) the necessary adjustments are smaller.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The consistency of eleven selected fast-reactor and two neutron-field integral experiments with the ENDF/B-IV and -V libraries was examined by considering contributions to chi-square. Integral measurements least consistent with each given library were identified one at a time, and the particular cross sections which were significantly adjusted at each step were also identified. The results of this analysis demonstrate that, with respect to twelve out of the thirteen integral measurements considered, ENDF/B-V is a marked improvement over Version IV in the sense that (a) the integral data are significantly more consistent with Version V than with Version IV, (b) fewer cross sections need to be adjusted to achieve agreement between all the experimental data and the corresponding values calculated by Version V, and (c) the necessary adjustments are smaller.

Key concepts: Consistency (knowledge bases), Nuclear data, Neutron, Nuclear physics, Mathematics, Physics, Discrete mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relative consistency of ENDF/B-IV and -V with fast-reactor benchmarks — Research Paper | ScholarLens