Relative consistency of ENDF/B-IV and -V with fast-reactor benchmarks
Y. Yeivin, J. J. Wagschal, J.H. Marable, C.R. Weisbin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Y. Yeivin, J. J. Wagschal, J.H. Marable, C.R. Weisbin
Abstract
Open-access reader
The consistency of eleven selected fast-reactor and two neutron-field integral experiments with the ENDF/B-IV and -V libraries was examined by considering contributions to chi-square. Integral measurements least consistent with each given library were identified one at a time, and the particular cross sections which were significantly adjusted at each step were also identified. The results of this analysis demonstrate that, with respect to twelve out of the thirteen integral measurements considered, ENDF/B-V is a marked improvement over Version IV in the sense that (a) the integral data are significantly more consistent with Version V than with Version IV, (b) fewer cross sections need to be adjusted to achieve agreement between all the experimental data and the corresponding values calculated by Version V, and (c) the necessary adjustments are smaller.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The consistency of eleven selected fast-reactor and two neutron-field integral experiments with the ENDF/B-IV and -V libraries was examined by considering contributions to chi-square. Integral measurements least consistent with each given library were identified one at a time, and the particular cross sections which were significantly adjusted at each step were also identified. The results of this analysis demonstrate that, with respect to twelve out of the thirteen integral measurements considered, ENDF/B-V is a marked improvement over Version IV in the sense that (a) the integral data are significantly more consistent with Version V than with Version IV, (b) fewer cross sections need to be adjusted to achieve agreement between all the experimental data and the corresponding values calculated by Version V, and (c) the necessary adjustments are smaller.
Key concepts: Consistency (knowledge bases), Nuclear data, Neutron, Nuclear physics, Mathematics, Physics, Discrete mathematics