2009•Methods in molecular biologyRequires access

Plant Genome Annotation Methods

Shu Ouyang, Françoise Thibaud‐Nissen, Kevin L. Childs, Wei Zhong Zhu, C. Robin Buell

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Annotation of plant genomic sequences can be separated into structural and functional annotation. Structural annotation is the foundation of all genomics as without accurate gene models understanding gene function or evolution of genes across taxa can be impeded. Structural annotation is dependent on sensitive, specific computational programs and deep experimental evidence to identify gene features within genomic DNA. Functional annotation is highly dependent on sequence similarity to other known genes or proteins as the majority of initial "first-pass" functional annotation on a genomic scale is transitive. Coupling structural and functional annotation across genomes in a comparative manner promotes more accurate annotation as well as an understanding of gene and genome evolution. With the increasing availability of plant genome sequence data, the value of comparative annotation will increase. As with any new field, methodologies are evolving for genome annotation and will improve in the future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Annotation of plant genomic sequences can be separated into structural and functional annotation. Structural annotation is the foundation of all genomics as without accurate gene models understanding gene function or evolution of genes across taxa can be impeded. Structural annotation is dependent on sensitive, specific computational programs and deep experimental evidence to identify gene features within genomic DNA. Functional annotation is highly dependent on sequence similarity to other known genes or proteins as the majority of initial "first-pass" functional annotation on a genomic scale is transitive. Coupling structural and functional annotation across genomes in a comparative manner promotes more accurate annotation as well as an understanding of gene and genome evolution. With the increasing availability of plant genome sequence data, the value of comparative annotation will increase. As with any new field, methodologies are evolving for genome annotation and will improve in the future.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Annotation of plant genomic sequences can be separated into structural and functional annotation. Structural annotation is the foundation of all genomics as without accurate gene models understanding gene function or evolution of genes across taxa can be impeded. Structural annotation is dependent on sensitive, specific computational programs and deep experimental evidence to identify gene features within genomic DNA. Functional annotation is highly dependent on sequence similarity to other known genes or proteins as the majority of initial "first-pass" functional annotation on a genomic scale is transitive. Coupling structural and functional annotation across genomes in a comparative manner promotes more accurate annotation as well as an understanding of gene and genome evolution. With the increasing availability of plant genome sequence data, the value of comparative annotation will increase. As with any new field, methodologies are evolving for genome annotation and will improve in the future.

Key concepts: Annotation, Computational biology, Genome, Biology, Genome project, Computer science, Genetics, Gene

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Plant Genome Annotation Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens