2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Habitus and creativity in popular music

Matthew Bannister

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses Jason Toynbee’s (2000) application of Pierre Bourdieu’s account of cultural production to popular music creation, highlighting the different agendas operating in their theories, specifically how Bourdieu’s “demystification” of culture as the production of capital, hierarchy and symbolic difference is at odds both with Toynbee’s account and arguably also with his own concept of habitus. It is argued, following Hesmondhalgh (2005), that Bourdieu’s emphasis on high cultural autonomy is too inflexible to be effectively applied to popular culture and that furthermore, following Dreyfus and Rabinow (1993), Bourdieu departs from his own emphasis on sociological reflexivity (central to habitus) by claiming to explain all creative action as a struggle for symbolic capital.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses Jason Toynbee’s (2000) application of Pierre Bourdieu’s account of cultural production to popular music creation, highlighting the different agendas operating in their theories, specifically how Bourdieu’s “demystification” of culture as the production of capital, hierarchy and symbolic difference is at odds both with Toynbee’s account and arguably also with his own concept of habitus. It is argued, following Hesmondhalgh (2005), that Bourdieu’s emphasis on high cultural autonomy is too inflexible to be effectively applied to popular culture and that furthermore, following Dreyfus and Rabinow (1993), Bourdieu departs from his own emphasis on sociological reflexivity (central to habitus) by claiming to explain all creative action as a struggle for symbolic capital.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses Jason Toynbee’s (2000) application of Pierre Bourdieu’s account of cultural production to popular music creation, highlighting the different agendas operating in their theories, specifically how Bourdieu’s “demystification” of culture as the production of capital, hierarchy and symbolic difference is at odds both with Toynbee’s account and arguably also with his own concept of habitus. It is argued, following Hesmondhalgh (2005), that Bourdieu’s emphasis on high cultural autonomy is too inflexible to be effectively applied to popular culture and that furthermore, following Dreyfus and Rabinow (1993), Bourdieu departs from his own emphasis on sociological reflexivity (central to habitus) by claiming to explain all creative action as a struggle for symbolic capital.

Key concepts: Habitus, Cultural capital, Sociology, Reflexivity, Symbolic capital, Symbolic power, Epistemology, Hierarchy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Habitus and creativity in popular music — Research Paper | ScholarLens