2011Journal of Mathematics and StatisticsOpen access

Parameter Estimation for the Double Pareto Distribution

Renuganth

Open full text 29 citations

Abstract

Problem statement: The double Pareto distribution appeared most often as model for variety of fields, including archaeology, biology, economics, environmental science, finance and physics.The distribution exhibits Paretian power-law behavior in both tails.The family of double Pareto distributions has recently been proposed for modeling growth rates such as annual gross domestic product, stock prices, foreign currency exchange rates and company sizes.In this study, I develop parameter estimates for the double Pareto distribution that are easy to compute.I compare the performance of the maximum likelihood estimate with Bayesian and the method of moments estimates.Approach: This study contracted with maximum likelihood, the method of moments and Bayesian using Jeffrey's prior and the extension of Jeffrey's prior information.The comparisons are made on the performance of these estimators with respect to the Mean Squared Error (MSE) for small, moderate and large samples and for some values of the scale and the extension of Jeffrey's prior parameters using the simulation techniques.Results: It turns out that the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian method with Jeffrey's prior result in smaller MSE compared to others in all cases.Conclusion: Based on the results of the simulation, the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian method with Jeffrey's prior are found to be the best with respect to MSE.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Problem statement: The double Pareto distribution appeared most often as model for variety of fields, including archaeology, biology, economics, environmental science, finance and physics.The distribution exhibits Paretian power-law behavior in both tails.The family of double Pareto distributions has recently been proposed for modeling growth rates such as annual gross domestic product, stock prices, foreign currency exchange rates and company sizes.In this study, I develop parameter estimates for the double Pareto distribution that are easy to compute.I compare the performance of the maximum likelihood estimate with Bayesian and the method of moments estimates.Approach: This study contracted with maximum likelihood, the method of moments and Bayesian using Jeffrey's prior and the extension of Jeffrey's prior information.The comparisons are made on the performance of these estimators with respect to the Mean Squared Error (MSE) for small, moderate and large samples and for some values of the scale and the extension of Jeffrey's prior parameters using the simulation techniques.Results: It turns out that the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian method with Jeffrey's prior result in smaller MSE compared to others in all cases.Conclusion: Based on the results of the simulation, the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian method with Jeffrey's prior are found to be the best with respect to MSE.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Problem statement: The double Pareto distribution appeared most often as model for variety of fields, including archaeology, biology, economics, environmental science, finance and physics.The distribution exhibits Paretian power-law behavior in both tails.The family of double Pareto distributions has recently been proposed for modeling growth rates such as annual gross domestic product, stock prices, foreign currency exchange rates and company sizes.In this study, I develop parameter estimates for the double Pareto distribution that are easy to compute.I compare the performance of the maximum likelihood estimate with Bayesian and the method of moments estimates.Approach: This study contracted with maximum likelihood, the method of moments and Bayesian using Jeffrey's prior and the extension of Jeffrey's prior information.The comparisons are made on the performance of these estimators with respect to the Mean Squared Error (MSE) for small, moderate and large samples and for some values of the scale and the extension of Jeffrey's prior parameters using the simulation techniques.Results: It turns out that the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian method with Jeffrey's prior result in smaller MSE compared to others in all cases.Conclusion: Based on the results of the simulation, the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian method with Jeffrey's prior are found to be the best with respect to MSE.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Pareto distribution, Bayes estimator, Mean squared error, Estimator, Lomax distribution, Pareto principle, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parameter Estimation for the Double Pareto Distribution — Research Paper | ScholarLens