1999Unpublished venueRequires access

INNOVATIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE IN EUROPE

S C Tignor, L L Brown, J L Butner, R A Cunard, Stacy Cagle Davis, H G Hawkins, Edward L Fischer, M R Kehrli, P F Rusch, W S Wainwright

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

This summary report describes a May 1998 transportation technology scanning tour of four European countries. The tour was co-sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and the Transportation Research Board (TRB). The tour team consisted of 10 traffic engineers who visited England, France, Germany, and Sweden to observe traffic control devices and methodology and to determine if any European practices should and could be recommended for use in the United States. Team members included representatives from FHWA, TRB, Texas Transportation Institute, Montgomery County (Maryland), and the state departments of transportation of Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. This report is organized into five key chapters: Traffic Control Devices; Freeway Control; Operational Practices; Information Management; and Administrative Practices. The material within chapters falls within two categories: Primary Findings and Other Observations. The team noted a number of traffic control practices, from signing to speed control to information management that were being effectively used by the Europeans. Team members believe that many of these innovations could and should be introduced on U.S. streets and highways. Among the devices and practices recommended for further study for U.S. adoption are specific freeway pavement markings, variable speed control, lane control signals, intelligent speed adaption, innovative intersection control, and variable message signs that incorporate pictograms. The report includes statements for proposed research problems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This summary report describes a May 1998 transportation technology scanning tour of four European countries. The tour was co-sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and the Transportation Research Board (TRB). The tour team consisted of 10 traffic engineers who visited England, France, Germany, and Sweden to observe traffic control devices and methodology and to determine if any European practices should and could be recommended for use in the United States. Team members included representatives from FHWA, TRB, Texas Transportation Institute, Montgomery County (Maryland), and the state departments of transportation of Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. This report is organized into five key chapters: Traffic Control Devices; Freeway Control; Operational Practices; Information Management; and Administrative Practices. The material within chapters falls within two categories: Primary Findings and Other Observations. The team noted a number of traffic control practices, from signing to speed control to information management that were being effectively used by the Europeans. Team members believe that many of these innovations could and should be introduced on U.S. streets and highways. Among the devices and practices recommended for further study for U.S. adoption are specific freeway pavement markings, variable speed control, lane control signals, intelligent speed adaption, innovative intersection control, and variable message signs that incorporate pictograms. The report includes statements for proposed research problems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This summary report describes a May 1998 transportation technology scanning tour of four European countries. The tour was co-sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and the Transportation Research Board (TRB). The tour team consisted of 10 traffic engineers who visited England, France, Germany, and Sweden to observe traffic control devices and methodology and to determine if any European practices should and could be recommended for use in the United States. Team members included representatives from FHWA, TRB, Texas Transportation Institute, Montgomery County (Maryland), and the state departments of transportation of Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. This report is organized into five key chapters: Traffic Control Devices; Freeway Control; Operational Practices; Information Management; and Administrative Practices. The material within chapters falls within two categories: Primary Findings and Other Observations. The team noted a number of traffic control practices, from signing to speed control to information management that were being effectively used by the Europeans. Team members believe that many of these innovations could and should be introduced on U.S. streets and highways. Among the devices and practices recommended for further study for U.S. adoption are specific freeway pavement markings, variable speed control, lane control signals, intelligent speed adaption, innovative intersection control, and variable message signs that incorporate pictograms. The report includes statements for proposed research problems.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Control (management), State highway, Intersection (aeronautics), Engineering, Best practice, Operations research, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
INNOVATIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE IN EUROPE — Research Paper | ScholarLens