1985•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Natural gas regulatory dilemma: a market solution, another complex compromise, or the status quo

Al H. Ringleb

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A review of the regulatory structure provided by the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) of 1978 and a comparison of the Act with provisions in major pending House and Senate bills finds that Congress is still struggling to resolve the natural gas regulation/deregulation debate. The bills offer a variety of alternatives ranging from partial decontrol to recontrol. They reflect the differences between the parties in interest: the producers and pipelines, distributors, residential consumers, and industrial consumers. The enactment of any one alternative will benefit some parties at the expense of others. The major issues remain pricing, contracts, market access, market growth, and pipeline regulation. The evidence suggests that a properly functioning natural gas market requires an expansive deregulatory alternative, but the current bills concentrate on the pricing issue and short-term solutions. 1 table.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A review of the regulatory structure provided by the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) of 1978 and a comparison of the Act with provisions in major pending House and Senate bills finds that Congress is still struggling to resolve the natural gas regulation/deregulation debate. The bills offer a variety of alternatives ranging from partial decontrol to recontrol. They reflect the differences between the parties in interest: the producers and pipelines, distributors, residential consumers, and industrial consumers. The enactment of any one alternative will benefit some parties at the expense of others. The major issues remain pricing, contracts, market access, market growth, and pipeline regulation. The evidence suggests that a properly functioning natural gas market requires an expansive deregulatory alternative, but the current bills concentrate on the pricing issue and short-term solutions. 1 table.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A review of the regulatory structure provided by the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) of 1978 and a comparison of the Act with provisions in major pending House and Senate bills finds that Congress is still struggling to resolve the natural gas regulation/deregulation debate. The bills offer a variety of alternatives ranging from partial decontrol to recontrol. They reflect the differences between the parties in interest: the producers and pipelines, distributors, residential consumers, and industrial consumers. The enactment of any one alternative will benefit some parties at the expense of others. The major issues remain pricing, contracts, market access, market growth, and pipeline regulation. The evidence suggests that a properly functioning natural gas market requires an expansive deregulatory alternative, but the current bills concentrate on the pricing issue and short-term solutions. 1 table.

Key concepts: Deregulation, Dilemma, Expansive, Compromise, Natural gas, Economics, Business, Status quo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Natural gas regulatory dilemma: a market solution, another complex compromise, or the status quo — Research Paper | ScholarLens