1996PubMedRequires access

[Penile prosthesis. Indications, classification, technic, complications, and safety].

M Rosselló Barbará

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the indications of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and describe a new classification based on the design and material of the prosthesis. METHODS: Penile prosthesis are classified. The advantages and disadvantages of the different prosthesis types are given. The surgical technique is described, as well as the pre-, intra- and postoperative complications observed in 300 procedures involving penile prosthesis performed over a 10-year period. RESULTS: 6 of the 300 prosthesis required removal (4 of these 6 prosthesis were reimplanted); 17 prosthesis were changed due to implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Penile prostheses are the best solution currently available for erectile dysfunction not amenable to any other type of treatment and carry minimal complications if the technique is performed correctly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To review the indications of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and describe a new classification based on the design and material of the prosthesis. METHODS: Penile prosthesis are classified. The advantages and disadvantages of the different prosthesis types are given. The surgical technique is described, as well as the pre-, intra- and postoperative complications observed in 300 procedures involving penile prosthesis performed over a 10-year period. RESULTS: 6 of the 300 prosthesis required removal (4 of these 6 prosthesis were reimplanted); 17 prosthesis were changed due to implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Penile prostheses are the best solution currently available for erectile dysfunction not amenable to any other type of treatment and carry minimal complications if the technique is performed correctly.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the indications of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and describe a new classification based on the design and material of the prosthesis. METHODS: Penile prosthesis are classified. The advantages and disadvantages of the different prosthesis types are given. The surgical technique is described, as well as the pre-, intra- and postoperative complications observed in 300 procedures involving penile prosthesis performed over a 10-year period. RESULTS: 6 of the 300 prosthesis required removal (4 of these 6 prosthesis were reimplanted); 17 prosthesis were changed due to implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Penile prostheses are the best solution currently available for erectile dysfunction not amenable to any other type of treatment and carry minimal complications if the technique is performed correctly.

Key concepts: Penile prosthesis, Prosthesis, Medicine, Erectile dysfunction, Prosthesis Implantation, Surgery, Implant, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Penile prosthesis. Indications, classification, technic, complications, and safety]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens